Election of Board Officers (Chair, Vice Chair)
Elect Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year
First meeting after July 1 each year (NDCC 21-10-04). Q1 = fiscal year opening.
Fiduciary Governance Framework
The North Dakota State Investment Board’s living, navigable framework for disciplined collective fiduciary decision-making.
Fundamentally, board governance is about disciplined collective decision-making: identifying the key board decisions, assigning clear authority, and providing the insights required for prudent judgment. The GPS replaces a static policy manual with a living system organized around how the Board actually governs.
The GPS is structured around five integrated parts, each grounded in statute. Together they form a structured cycle of fiduciary decisions, policy approvals, governance discipline, and public accountability:
Governance policy has two distinct but integrated targets. First, it guides the Board in how fiduciary decisions are made and how roles are exercised. Second, it provides executives and staff with clear, navigable delegation so that Board intent is executed consistently and without ambiguity. The two sections below explain each in turn.
Governance policy should define how the Board governs, not how staff operate. Trustees should be able to clearly explain how the Board reaches decisions and the role each trustee plays. The focus is on fiduciary responsibilities, decision framing and resolution, authority reserved to the Board versus delegated, and committee roles and reporting. It establishes explicit decision architecture (inputs, constraints, timing), reinforces a long-term, patient-capital orientation, and prevents drift into operational or advisory activity.
The Board has five fundamental powers:
Governance policy primarily addresses the Board’s and trustees’ roles in the first three powers, enabling the Board to govern through direction and delegation while allowing execution, oversight, and verification to occur without confusion.
For executives and staff, governance policies function as an operational decision system. The purpose is to enable independent execution of Board direction without continual interpretation or informal escalation. Staff should be able to determine what authority is delegated, to whom, within what limits, and when escalation is required.
A well-designed policy makes delegation boundaries easy to find and apply, reduces reliance on precedent or institutional memory, and supports consistent decision-making across the organization. Navigability is therefore a core delegation control: it assures staff can execute Board-approved authority consistently, within limits, and aligned with Board intent. Poor navigability increases discretion and workarounds; strong navigability reinforces discipline and accountability.
The GPS works like a website or a map. Use the tabs at the top of the page to move between the five parts of the system. Within each part, content is organized into expandable sections you can open and close as needed.
The SIB’s fiduciary foundation rests on the legal and statutory bedrock of the North Dakota Century Code (N.D.C.C. Chapter 21-10). All GPS policies are grounded in statute.
Mission
The mission of the North Dakota State Investment Board is to prudently invest entrusted assets to generate long-term value while meeting liquidity, fiduciary, and statutory obligations.
All GPS policies are based on statute and the North Dakota Century Code (N.D.C.C. Chapter 21-10) — the legal bedrock of collective decision-making, not aspirational guidance.
Who We Serve
For purposes of this manual, beneficiaries of the Retirement and Investment Office (RIO) and the SIB include those entities and participants defined by statute, as well as those that have contracted for investment or related services under statutory authority. This includes all current and future beneficiaries of the funds managed by the SIB, such as public pension and retirement funds, legacy and trust funds, insurance and guarantee funds, and growth and stabilization funds.
In fulfilling its fiduciary duties, the SIB recognizes the principle of intergenerational equity and balances the needs of current beneficiaries with the responsibility to preserve purchasing power, financial sustainability, and flexibility for future beneficiaries, taking into account differing fund purposes, time horizons, and risk tolerances.
| Direct Contractual Beneficiaries | Program Beneficiaries | Intergenerational / Sovereign Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|
| Retirees | Public school students | Current citizens |
| Active members | Health program recipients | Future citizens |
| Injured workers / Business Owners | Cultural program beneficiaries | |
| 529 account beneficiaries |
Unlike a single-purpose pension fund, NDSIB has multi-client fiduciary complexity:
This can materially affect asset allocation, risk tolerance, and reporting.
Effective stakeholder relations are essential to sustaining trust, legitimacy, and long-term effectiveness in a public fiduciary organization. Because many stakeholders — beneficiaries, policymakers, regulators, participating agencies, and the public — interact with the organization episodically or indirectly, the quality, consistency, and tone of those interactions materially shape confidence in the institution and its governance.
The Executive Director shall assure that all interactions with stakeholders, the public, and other government entities are conducted in a manner that reflects the agency's core values of integrity, accountability, and service, and that reinforces the organization's fiduciary purpose and public mandate. Communications shall be accurate, clear, timely, and professional, and shall appropriately distinguish established facts, policy positions, and analytical conclusions from personal opinions or commentary.
By maintaining disciplined, transparent, and respectful stakeholder relations — often without seeking visibility or advocacy — the organization supports informed oversight, reduces reputational and governance risk, and preserves the trust necessary to operate effectively across political cycles and market environments.
See also — External Communications
Core Duties
By virtue of the responsibilities assigned to the State Investment Board (SIB) by N.D.C.C. Chapter 21-10, the members of the SIB are fiduciaries for multiple statutory funds. Through contractual obligations, fiduciary responsibility extends to contracted additional funds.
A fiduciary is a person who has discretionary authority or management responsibility for assets held in trust to which another has beneficial title or interest. The fiduciary is responsible for knowing the "prudent requirements" for the investment of trust assets. Remedial actions may be assessed against fiduciaries for violations of fiduciary duty.
Each Board and Committee member shall discharge their duties solely in the interest of the beneficiaries and participants, placing those interests above any personal, political, or external considerations, avoiding conflicts of interest, and acting with undivided loyalty to the funds entrusted to the Board.
Members shall comply with all applicable statutes, regulations, Board policies, ethics requirements, duly adopted procedures and plan documents, assuring that all actions remain within the scope of lawful authority and delegated responsibility including, for example, Open Meetings.
A prudent investor is evaluated based on the demonstration of prudence compared to prevailing peer practices.
North Dakota state law provides broad fiduciary guidelines for the SIB members. NDCC § 21-10-07 specifies that the State Investment Board shall apply the prudent investor rule in investing for funds under its supervision except that § 21-10-07.1 requires the SIB to give preference to qualified investment firms and financial institutions with a presence in the state for Legacy Fund investment purposes. "The prudent investor rule" means that in making investments, the fiduciaries shall exercise the judgment and care, under the circumstances then prevailing, that an institutional investor of ordinary prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercises in the management of large investments entrusted to it, not regarding speculation but regarding the permanent disposition of funds, considering probable safety of capital as well as probable income.
Procedural prudence is a term that has evolved to describe the appropriate activities of a person (or persons) who act in a fiduciary role. Court decisions to date indicate that procedural prudence is more important in assessing fiduciary activities than actual portfolio performance. A fiduciary cannot be faulted for making the "wrong" decision provided that proper due diligence was performed.
The key to successfully discharging the SIB's fiduciary duties is the establishment of and adherence to proper due diligence procedures. While not bound by ERISA (Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974), the SIB will use the procedural prudence outlined by ERISA as guidance in developing its procedures:
The Board demonstrates prudence through process evidence, including:
Conduct Policy
Conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety must be avoided by the SIB, the Executive Director, and all executives and staff. No individual subject to this policy shall allow family, social, professional, financial, political, or other relationships to influence, or appear to influence, their judgment in discharging their official responsibilities.
The SIB, the Executive Director, and all executives and staff must refrain from financial and business dealings that tend to reflect adversely on the proper discharge of their duties or create the appearance of divided loyalty. They must avoid situations that compromise, or could reasonably be perceived to compromise, their independence, objectivity, or fiduciary obligation to act in the exclusive interest of beneficiaries and the fund.
If a conflict of interest unavoidably arises, the individual shall immediately disclose the conflict in writing.
The individual shall comply with any subsequent recommendations or directives issued by the appropriate authority, including recusal, mitigation, or other remedial measures.
Conflicts of interest to be avoided include, but are not limited to:
For purposes of this policy, "Conflict of Interest" means a situation in which a Board member, the Executive Director, an executive, or a staff member has a conflict of interest as that term is defined in North Dakota statute and in rules promulgated by the North Dakota Ethics Commission under N.D.A.C. Chapter 115-04-01. This policy is intended to be interpreted consistently with all applicable provisions of the North Dakota Century Code and regulations of the North Dakota Ethics Commission.
The Executive Director shall establish and maintain written policies and procedures governing: disclosure of conflicts of interest; annual affirmations of understanding of this policy; ongoing reporting of potential or actual conflicts; documentation and retention of disclosures; and procedures for review and determination of appropriate mitigation actions.
The Executive Director, all executives, and all staff shall affirm their understanding of this policy annually, in writing, and shall promptly disclose any actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest that may arise. Board members shall affirm compliance with disclosures in accordance with Board policy and applicable law.
This policy is adopted pursuant to NDCC § 21-10-01 et seq. and applicable fiduciary standards under NDCC § 54-52-02.9 to ensure that Trustees act solely in the interest of beneficiaries and maintain independence from actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
Financial Interest means any direct or indirect ownership, compensation arrangement, employment relationship, or other material economic interest held by a Trustee or an Immediate Family Member.
Immediate Family Member includes a spouse, domestic partner, dependent child, or any person residing in the Trustee's household.
Material Relationship means any relationship that a reasonable person could conclude may influence, or appear to influence, the Trustee's judgment.
Event-Driven Disclosure means disclosure required within ten (10) business days of a material change in circumstances.
At the time of roll call for each Board meeting, each Trustee shall affirm on the record whether they have any actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest with respect to any item on the meeting agenda.
Each Trustee shall complete and sign an annual written disclosure statement affirming compliance with fiduciary duties of loyalty, care, and compliance under NDCC § 54-52-02.9 and applicable law. The annual disclosure shall: identify all Financial Interests and Material Relationships; affirm the Trustee's understanding of the duty to act solely in the interest of beneficiaries; and acknowledge the obligation to update disclosures promptly upon change.
The Governance and Policy Review Committee shall review annual disclosures and report compliance status to the Board.
A Trustee shall disclose any new or changed Financial Interest or Material Relationship within ten (10) business days of becoming aware of such interest.
If a matter presents an actual or potential conflict:
Disclosure forms and related materials shall be maintained in accordance with NDCC § 44-04-18 and § 44-04-30. Confidential investment information shall be handled consistent with NDCC § 44-04-22.
Conduct Policy
Pursuant to NDCC § 21-10-01 et seq., the Board acts only through official Board action taken in compliance with NDCC § 44-04-19.
The Chair serves as official spokesperson on governance matters. The Executive Director serves as official spokesperson on operational and investment matters. Individual Trustees have no independent authority to represent the Board unless expressly authorized by Board action.
When speaking in a personal capacity, Trustees shall clearly state: "The views expressed are my own and do not represent the position of the North Dakota State Investment Board."
Board positions presented to legislative bodies must reflect official Board action. Testimony on behalf of the Board requires coordination with the Chair and Executive Director.
In the event of a material legal, reputational, or operational matter:
Trustees shall not disclose non-public investment, personnel, legal, or beneficiary information protected under NDCC § 44-04-22 or other applicable law. Digital and social media communications are subject to this restriction and applicable public records retention requirements under NDCC § 44-04-30.
Conduct Policy
This policy is adopted pursuant to NDCC § 21-10-01 et seq. and applicable fiduciary standards under NDCC § 54-52-02.9 to assure that Board members have timely and appropriate access to information required to fulfill fiduciary duties, while safeguarding confidential, sensitive, and market-moving information protected under NDCC § 44-04-22 and preserving the integrity of the SIB’s governance and operating model.
This policy applies to:
This policy governs information requests beyond the materials routinely provided in Board and Committee meeting packets. Materials included in approved meeting packets are, by definition, accessible to Board and Committee members in accordance with NDCC § 44-04-19 and confidentiality protections under § 44-04-22.
Confidential Information means non-public information held by the SIB or RIO, including investment, personnel, legal, contractual, and beneficiary information protected under NDCC § 44-04-22 or other applicable law.
Material Non-Public Information (MNPI) means information not generally available to the public that a reasonable investor would consider significant in making an investment decision, including pending transactions, manager evaluations in progress, deal pipeline, and material portfolio actions.
Fiduciary Purpose means the exercise of a Board or Committee responsibility to set direction, approve, oversee, verify, or report, consistent with the Board’s five fundamental powers.
The Board affirms the following principles governing access to information:
The following classifications govern Board access to information held by the RIO:
| Classification | Examples | Access Control |
|---|---|---|
| Board Materials | Approved Board and Committee packets, decision memoranda, performance reports | Full access for Board and Committee members |
| Confidential | Risk reports, manager evaluations, internal audit working papers | Controlled access through Executive Director or Chief Investment Officer |
| Highly Confidential | Personnel matters, active litigation, contract negotiations | Restricted access through the Executive Director |
| Market-Sensitive (MNPI) | Active trades, deal pipeline, pre-announcement material portfolio actions | Strictly limited; exceptional approval only by the Executive Director in consultation with the Office of the Attorney General |
All requests for information beyond routine meeting materials shall be submitted in writing through the Executive Director, with the Communications and Outreach Director maintaining the request log.
| Request Type | Approval Authority |
|---|---|
| Routine | Communications and Outreach Director |
| Sensitive | Executive Director |
| Highly Sensitive | Executive Director with notification to the Board Chair |
| Exceptional (including MNPI access) | Executive Director and Board Chair, with Office of the Attorney General consultation as required |
Written requests for non-public information shall identify:
The Executive Director shall acknowledge requests promptly and respond within a reasonable period appropriate to the request’s complexity and sensitivity. Denials shall be in writing with stated rationale and may be appealed to the Board Chair.
Board and Committee members shall not:
The following handling requirements apply to confidential and highly confidential information:
A Board or Committee member who inadvertently receives or becomes aware of MNPI shall:
Board and Committee members shall:
The Communications Director, under the direction of the Executive Director, shall maintain a log of all formal information requests submitted under this policy, including:
The Executive Director shall report to the ARCC on an exception basis regarding denied requests, withdrawn requests, and material handling incidents. The Internal Audit function may review the log as part of its risk-based audit plan. Material breaches shall be escalated by the Executive Director to the Board Chair and to the ARCC.
Breaches of this policy may result in:
This policy shall be reviewed by the GPRC at least every three (3) years, or sooner upon material changes in:
See also — Disclosure; Conflicts of Interest and Appearance of Impropriety; External Communications; Use of Artificial Intelligence; Securities Litigation Oversight & Annual Reporting.
Conduct Policy
Trustee travel shall support the Board's fiduciary obligations under NDCC § 21-10-01 et seq. and NDCC § 54-52-02.9.
Reimbursable travel must relate to one or more of the following:
Travel reimbursement shall comply with applicable state travel policies and reimbursement rates. Expense documentation must be submitted within thirty (30) days of travel completion.
Within thirty (30) days of travel completion, the Trustee shall provide a written summary to the Board describing:
An annual summary of Trustee travel expenditures shall be included in Board materials consistent with NDCC § 44-04-18.
Conduct Policy
Each Trustee shall execute the oath of office required under NDCC § 44-04-10 and § 54-06-01 prior to participating in Board deliberations or voting.
The oath shall acknowledge:
At the first meeting of each fiscal year, Trustees shall reaffirm their oath and fiduciary obligations. Reaffirmation shall be recorded in the minutes consistent with NDCC § 44-04-19.
Executed oaths shall be maintained in permanent Board records consistent with NDCC § 44-04-30.
A Trustee who has not executed or reaffirmed the required oath may not vote or participate in official Board action until compliance is achieved.
Conduct Policy
The purpose of this policy is to establish principles, governance standards, and control requirements governing the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies by the North Dakota State Investment Board ("Board") and the Retirement and Investment Office ("RIO") staff. This policy is adopted pursuant to NDCC § 21-10-01 et seq. and is intended to assure that the use of AI supports the Board's fiduciary obligations under NDCC § 54-52-02.9, protects confidential information under NDCC § 44-04-22, and complies with applicable open records and open meetings laws.
This policy applies to: all Board members; the Executive Director; all RIO employees; and contractors and service providers acting on behalf of the Board where AI tools are used in connection with Board business.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) means software systems or tools that perform tasks typically requiring human intelligence, including but not limited to machine learning systems, predictive models, generative AI, large language models, natural language processing systems, and automated decision-support tools.
Generative AI means AI systems that generate text, images, code, models, or other content in response to prompts.
Material Decision Context means any matter involving investment decisions, manager selection, asset allocation, procurement, risk management, governance, personnel, benefit determination, or other actions that may materially affect beneficiaries or public funds.
Subject to safeguards in this policy, AI may be used for:
The following uses are prohibited unless expressly approved by the Executive Director and consistent with law:
Where AI tools are used in connection with investment analysis: AI outputs shall be considered advisory only; material assumptions must be independently validated; documentation shall identify the extent to which AI informed analysis; and final recommendations shall clearly reflect professional judgment and fiduciary review. The use of AI shall not dilute the prudent investor/prudent expert standard required under NDCC § 54-52-02.9.
8.1 Executive Director Responsibilities. The Executive Director shall: approve AI tools used for official business; ensure appropriate vendor due diligence and contractual safeguards; integrate AI risk into enterprise risk management; and report material AI-related risks or incidents to the Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee.
8.2 Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee Oversight. The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee shall: oversee AI-related operational, cybersecurity, and compliance risks; review AI governance practices periodically; and ensure alignment with internal audit plans, where appropriate.
Contracts with external managers, consultants, or service providers that materially use AI in connection with Board assets shall: disclose such use when more than incidental; provide assurances regarding data confidentiality and cybersecurity; and confirm compliance with applicable law and fiduciary standards.
AI-generated content used in Board business constitutes a public record where required under NDCC § 44-04-18 and shall be retained in accordance with NDCC § 44-04-30. Prompt histories or AI interactions that materially inform recommendations to the Board shall be retained as part of the decision-support record.
Trustees and staff shall receive periodic education regarding: appropriate AI use; data confidentiality risks; and fiduciary implications of AI-supported analysis.
This policy shall be reviewed at least every two (2) years or more frequently if significant technological or regulatory developments warrant revision. The Board recognizes that AI tools may enhance analytical depth and operational efficiency. However, prudence is measured by the quality of human judgment exercised in oversight, not by the sophistication of tools employed.
Conduct Policy
Oversight of securities litigation affecting the Board's investment portfolios is a fiduciary responsibility of the Board, supported by management. The Executive Director shall provide the Board, at least annually, with a written report on the status of securities litigation matters affecting the System's portfolios. The report shall enable the Board to fulfill its fiduciary duty of prudence in safeguarding investment assets entrusted to it.
1. Portfolio Exposure & Case Inventory
2. Participation Decisions
3. Claims Activity & Recoveries
4. Outside Counsel & Legal Coordination
5. Risk & Threshold Assessment
6. Policy & Process Review
7. Fiduciary & Governance Considerations
Management retains responsibility for:
The Board retains responsibility for:
Explicit role definitions across all levels — Legislature, Board, Committees, and Executive leadership.
Accountability Structure
The Board recognizes the 4 Lines Model as the foundation for reasonable assurance and independent reassurance and accountability:
Officers & Staff: CIO — Investment, CRO — Retirement. Provide reasonable assurance through execution, controls, and monitoring.
Officers & Staff: CFO/COO — Fiscal, Communications & Outreach Director. Shared Services: Legal / HR / IT. Provide reasonable assurance through controls and monitoring.
Officers & Staff: DA (Director of Audit), Internal Audit. Provides independent reassurance through objective review and assurance.
External Audit & Advisors: Investment Consultant, Actuary, Legal, Governance Advisor. Provides independent reassurance — direct report to Board.
The Board relies on all four lines to support prudent delegation and informed oversight. 1st and 2nd Lines provide reasonable assurance through execution, controls, and monitoring. 3rd and 4th Lines provide independent reassurance through objective review and assurance.
Framework
The North Dakota Legislature establishes the statutory framework within which the SIB operates. The Legislature's role is one of policy-setting, fiscal authorization, and accountability oversight — not investment management. The Legislature defines the rules, resources, and accountability expectations; the SIB governs and oversees investment activity within those statutory boundaries; and management executes.
The SIB has a statutory duty to report to the North Dakota Legislature to support transparency, accountability, and legislative oversight — without compromising the Board's fiduciary independence. The SIB reports what has been done, how public resources are safeguarded, and whether statutory intent is being met — while the Legislature retains oversight authority and the SIB retains fiduciary and operational independence.
The SIB’s reporting role includes:
Board Charter
Members of the SIB are set forth in Chapter 21-10 of the N.D.C.C. The Board comprises the following members:
Charge and management of the business: The SIB will have general charge and management of the business of TFFR and the SIB, subject to law, administrative rules and regulations, and governance policies. The SIB will make such policy as necessary to fulfill this obligation.
Representation by Designees: When the statutes allow a designee to represent a member of the SIB or an alternate to represent the TFFR or PERS Board, the Chair will recognize the individual for the record, and the individual(s) will then have the right to vote on matters before the SIB.
Administrative Support for TFFR: The SIB will be responsible for the operation of an administrative office that will provide support services to TFFR and the SIB.
The Board Chair will propose a slate of Committee members — based on the match between each Committee’s recommended capabilities and members’ interests — for Board approval. The Board may also form an investment advisory council. External Committee members shall be independent and free from material conflicts of interest, are subject to applicable ethics, disclosure, and recusal requirements, and their independence is reviewed at appointment and periodically thereafter.
A vacancy occurs upon: written resignation effective date; removal from an officer role (officer vacancy only); removal from Board membership (member vacancy; statutory); death; permanent incapacity; loss of eligibility; disqualifying legal status, if applicable; or failure to attend (threshold to be defined). The Executive Director will notify the Board within five business days of a known vacancy event; the Chair notifies the appointing authority within ten business days where applicable; and a log will be maintained.
The State Investment Board (SIB) serves as the fiduciary governing body responsible for the long-term stewardship, oversight, and protection of assets entrusted to the SIB on behalf of current and future beneficiaries. Board members collectively assure that investment policies, governance structures, and oversight systems are aligned with statutory mandates, fiduciary duties, and the long-term interests of plan participants, beneficiaries, and the State of North Dakota.
A SIB member is a long-horizon fiduciary steward, governing policy and oversight — not day-to-day management — to protect and grow entrusted assets in a manner consistent with law, purpose, and intergenerational responsibility.
Trustee Standards
Each Board member is expected to: prepare for and actively participate in Board and Committee assignments; exercise independent judgment while respecting collective Board decisions; ask informed, prudent questions focused on risk, assumptions, and long-term implications; avoid conflicts of interest and comply with ethics and disclosure requirements (See Disclosure); maintain confidentiality of non-public information; and support a culture of integrity, respect, and continuous improvement.
Board members are not expected to be investment professionals but are expected to govern prudently and intelligently. Desired competencies include:
Each member shall complete 10 hours annual continuing education (CE) with the curriculum to be based on Board and Committee capability requirements. Credits may be earned through any combination of online or in-person training including conferences and in-house sessions. RIO staff will track completion.
Authority rests with the Board acting as a body, not with individual members. Individual Board members do not direct staff or make unilateral decisions on behalf of the SIB. Board performance is evaluated through periodic self-assessment.
Committee Framework
The Board holds the exclusive authority to approve policies, delegations, and major decisions, and remains ultimately responsible for prudent fiduciary processes, while Committees serve in an advisory and oversight capacity by conducting detailed research, developing recommendations for Board consideration, and overseeing and verifying that Board-approved decisions are implemented and performing as intended — without exercising independent approval or execution authority.
Standing Committees act as extensions of the Board's fiduciary authority, performing detailed review, analysis, and oversight within scopes defined by Board-approved charters. Committee authority is collective and advisory unless explicitly delegated by Board action.
Committees do not exercise independent governing authority unless expressly delegated by the Board, and all material decisions remain subject to full Board approval.
Board members are expected to govern consistent with the standards of a large, long-term institutional investor, informed by peer practices, fiduciary norms, and evolving governance and risk oversight frameworks. This includes:
Continuing education supports the Board's ability to meet institutional investor standards and evolving fiduciary expectations. Board members are expected to engage in ongoing fiduciary and governance education to:
Leadership
The officers of the SIB are a Chair and Vice Chair, one of which must be an appointed or elected member of the TFFR or PERS Board. The officers will be elected by the SIB to a one-year term at the first regularly scheduled meeting following July 1 of each year. Vacancies will be filled by the SIB at the first scheduled meeting following the vacancy.
The Chair will preside at all meetings of the SIB. In the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair will perform the duties of the Chair.
The Chairperson's primary responsibility is to assure the integrity of the Board's process. The Chairperson is the only Board member authorized to speak for the Board other than in specifically authorized instances. The duty of the Chairperson is to see that the Board operates consistently with state and federal law, administrative rules, and its own policies.
The Board agenda will be the responsibility and be coordinated by the Chairperson with the assistance of the Executive Director. Meeting discussion content will only be those issues which, according to Board policy, clearly belong to the Board and not the Executive Director, or in a Board member's opinion, may deal with fiduciary responsibilities. Deliberation will be fair, open, and thorough, but also efficient, timely, orderly, and brief. The Chairperson shall appoint a parliamentarian.
The Chairperson is empowered to chair Board meetings with all the commonly accepted authority of that position (e.g., ruling, recognizing). The Chairperson has no authority to make decisions about policies created by the Board. Therefore, the Chairperson has no authority to supervise or direct the Executive Director. The Chairperson may represent the Board to outside parties in announcing Board-stated positions and in stating Chairperson decisions and interpretations within the area delegated to the Chairperson.
The Chairperson is authorized, in consultation with the Executive Director, to grant approval for international travel by SIB members and to keep the Board informed on travel requests.
The Chair may call recess, enforce agenda/time rules, and refer disputes to the Governance Policy Review Committee (GPRC) for follow-up. The Chair assures deliberation remains within fiduciary scope.
The Chair is the initial point of contact for in-meeting conflict of interest (COI) disclosures and may request temporary recusal pending GPRC/legal review. The GPRC will make the final recommendation to the full Board.
The Chair reviews draft minutes for accuracy/completeness before approval.
The Chair supports leadership bench development with the GPRC (encourages continuing education participation; orients new members; identifies future officer candidates).
The Chair should assure committee outputs reach the Board with clear decision points, cross-committee coordination issues are identified, and follow-ups are assigned.
If the Chair is unable to serve, the Vice Chair will serve as Acting Chair until the Board elects a replacement at the next meeting (or sooner at a special meeting).
The Vice Chair works with the Chair on agenda planning; supports meeting process integrity; participates in governance self-assessment review; attends key briefings as appropriate. The Vice Chair does not act as spokesperson except in Chair absence or Board authorization.
The Budget & Finance Committee (BFC) and the Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee (ARCC) together provide treasurer-equivalent oversight. They will define handoffs (budget → financial reporting → controls/audit findings).
See also — Travel Policy
Executive Role
As the Board's single official link to the operating organization, the RIO's total performance will be considered to be synonymous with the Executive Director's performance. It is the responsibility of the Board to establish and maintain a job description for the Executive Director.
In 2021, SIB split the role of the investment director into two roles: Executive Director (ED) and Chief Investment Officer (CIO) with the CIO reporting to the ED. However, the legislation does not reflect this change.
Given that the title of Investment Director no longer exists, the policy should reflect the new titles and roles within RIO. Since the legislation cannot be changed in the short term, the following policy proposal is designed to clarify these relationships (ED and CIO).
References in N.D.C.C. § 21-10, including the “investment director” identified in N.D.C.C. § 21-10-02 and 21-10-05, are understood for purposes of this Governance Policy System to refer to the office held by the Executive Director of the Retirement and Investment Office.
Under the current structure of the Retirement and Investment Office, a single officer serves as the agency head of RIO under N.D.C.C. § 54-52.5 and holds the statutory investment director authority described in N.D.C.C. § 21-10-05, including the authority to sign and execute investment-related contracts and agreements relating to funds under the management of the State Investment Board, subject to the limitations established by law and by Board policy.
The Executive Director has delegated the day-to-day exercise of this investment director authority to the Chief Investment Officer, who signs and executes investment-related contracts and agreements relating to funds under the management of the State Investment Board within the scope of that delegation and consistent with the delegation framework established elsewhere in this Governance Policy System. The Executive Director retains the statutory authority and remains accountable for its proper exercise; the delegation does not relieve the Executive Director of that responsibility.
The Executive Director is responsible for executing Board-approved direction within the scope of delegated authority. Execution responsibilities include:
The Executive Director will be retained by the SIB, serve at the SIB's pleasure, be responsible for keeping the records of the SIB and TFFR Board actions and perform such duties as the SIB prescribes. The Executive Director will make out and give out all notices required to be given by law, procedures, or rules and regulations of the two Boards.
The Executive Director, as chief executive officer, is accountable to the Board acting as a body. The Board only will instruct the Executive Director through these written policies, delegating to the Executive Director the implementation and administration of these policies. The Executive Director is accountable for assuring compliance with laws, bylaws, and policies.
The Chair speaks on behalf of the SIB. The Executive Director is the spokesperson for RIO.
With respect to providing information and counsel to the Board, the Executive Director shall:
Execution Lines
The RIO’s management is responsible for financial and other reporting, internal controls, and compliance with laws, regulations, and ethics. The RIO 1st and 2nd Line unit supervisors are responsible for seeing that corrective action on reported weaknesses is either planned or taken within 30 days from the receipt of a report disclosing those weaknesses if known or applicable. The unit supervisors are also responsible for seeing that a written report of action planned or completed is sent to the Executive Director. If a plan for action is reported, a second report shall be made promptly upon completion of the plan.
Purpose: Assure the Teachers' Fund for Retirement (TFFR) program is administered prudently and in accordance with applicable statutes, administrative rules, and policies adopted by the TFFR Board of Trustees. The Chief Retirement Officer (CRO) supports the governance responsibilities of the TFFR Board by implementing Board policies, providing analysis and recommendations on retirement program matters, and ensuring the effective administration of benefits and member services. The CRO operates within the Retirement and Investment Office (RIO) under the direction of the Executive Director, with the position's primary governance connection to the TFFR Board.
Evaluation Criteria: Compliance with applicable state and federal laws governing the retirement program; effective implementation of TFFR Board policies; accuracy and timeliness of benefit administration, member services, and contribution processing; quality and reliability of information provided to the TFFR Board; responsiveness to plan members, stakeholders, and oversight authorities; and the successful coordination of actuarial, legal, and consulting services supporting the retirement program.
Policy Development and Program Administration: The CRO assists the Executive Director and the TFFR Board in developing administrative rules, policies, and procedures necessary to administer the retirement program. The CRO provides analysis and recommendations on retirement program issues, legislative proposals, and operational matters affecting the plan and supports the Board in carrying out its statutory responsibilities.
Retirement Program Operations: RIO staff, under the direction of the CRO, are responsible for the administration of the retirement program including the collection and processing of contributions, maintenance of member records, calculation and payment of retirement and disability benefits, and coordination with actuaries, legal counsel, and other service providers. Staff will provide the TFFR Board with accurate and timely information necessary to support the Board's oversight responsibilities and fiduciary duties.
Fiscal Services
Purpose: Assure the funds and accounts of SIB clients and TFFR beneficiaries are managed prudently under applicable accounting standards and practices.
Evaluation criteria: Internal and external audit reports, internal compliance controls, the publishing of timely and accurate performance reports and financial statements, and responsiveness and accuracy of reporting to oversight authorities.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits, or employment terms for staff shall comply with applicable state and federal law.
Accounting
The master custodian will provide RIO staff with such accounting detail and at such frequency as the staff deems necessary to fulfill the SIB’s reporting requirements. From this information, RIO staff will generate monthly and annual financial statements for each of the trust funds managed by the SIB. RIO staff is responsible to assure the proper valuation of all assets. Formal valuation policies must be developed and implemented utilizing industry best practices and GAAP accounting requirements.
The purpose of the internal audit division is to provide an independent, objective assurance and advisory activity designed to add value and improve North Dakota RIO’s operations. The mission of internal audit is to enhance and protect organizational value by providing risk-based and objective assurance, advice, and insight.
The Director of Audit (DA) will report directly to the SIB typically through the ARCC. Administrative matters will be coordinated with the Executive Director.
The audit staff shall have full, free, and unrestricted access to all RIO activities, records, property, and personnel relative to the subject under review.
The internal audit division will assist RIO in accomplishing its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.
Functions and units within RIO will be reviewed at appropriate intervals to determine whether they are effectively carrying out their responsibilities of planning, organizing, directing, and controlling in accordance with SIB and management instructions, applicable laws, policies, and procedures, and in a manner consistent with both the RIO objectives and high standards of administrative practice.
The Internal Audit Services Unit is responsible for developing and directing a broad, comprehensive program of internal auditing within RIO. The Internal Audit Services Unit will report administratively to management and functionally to the ARCC.
The Internal Audit Charter requires a QAIP (Quality Assurance and Improvement Program), including (1) ongoing internal monitoring, (2) annual internal assessments, and (3) external quality assessment (EQA) at least every five years.
The Fourth Line consists of independent external professionals engaged by the Board to provide objective assurance, expert judgment, and independent validation across critical fiduciary, financial, investment, and governance functions. These parties do not manage or execute operations; their role is to independently assess, test, advise, and opine—strengthening Board oversight, reducing blind spots, and reinforcing accountability.
Collectively, the Fourth Line enhances the Board’s ability to verify, challenge, and validate information and decisions, reinforcing trust, transparency, and long-term fiduciary integrity.
Who has the power to act, under what conditions, and with what limitations.
Reading the diagram: Each horizontal lane represents a level of authority. The Board governs through five powers: Conduct → Set → Approve & Delegate → Oversee → Verify & Report. Committees research, recommend, oversee, and independently verify. Staff advise and execute within delegated authority. Internal audit verifies operations and external audit verifies the integrity of financial statements. The Legislature authorizes and appropriates biennially; the Board is accountable to the Legislature and the public and reports to the Legislature.
Powers of the SIB
The GPS maps authority explicitly across five powers and five governance domains. Committees perform the due diligence necessary to support a recommendation to the full Board for its approval.
| Domain | Conduct Business | Research & Recommend | Set / Approve | Delegate | Oversee Execution | Verify & Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | Governance & Policy Review Committee | Governance & Policy Review Committee | SIB | ED | Governance & Policy Review Committee | Governance & Policy Review Committee |
| Investment | Investment Committee | Investment Committee | SIB | ED | Investment Committee | Investment Committee |
| Leadership & Talent | Executive Review & Compensation Committee | Executive Review & Compensation Committee | SIB | Executive Review & Compensation Committee / Budget & Finance Committee | Executive Review & Compensation Committee | Executive Review & Compensation Committee |
| Stewardship | SIB | Budget & Finance Committee | SIB / Legislature | ED | Budget & Finance Committee | Budget & Finance Committee |
| Accountability | Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee | Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee | SIB | DA / Ext. Auditor | Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee | Audit, Risk & Compliance Committee |
Authority Framework
The ND Legislature created the SIB. The SIB governs and exercises its authority through a prudent delegation architecture which embeds prudence across how authority is informed, delegated, exercised, overseen, independently verified, and reported. The Board may delegate authority to Committees, to the Executive Director, and others; however, delegation of authority does not and cannot delegate fiduciary responsibility.
The Board hires, evaluates, compensates and plans for the succession of the Executive Director. The Executive Director hires officers and staff and advises the SIB — typically through its Committees. Committees may retain independent consultants, perform due diligence and make recommendations to the SIB for its approval.
The Board sets direction and policy and exercises its authority to approve certain key decisions. The budget is subject to biennial approval by the Legislature. Once approved, the Board delegates authority and resources to the Executive Director. The Executive Director executes directions within board approved policy. Committees oversee performance and risk and escalate and report exceptions to the SIB. The SIB reports to the Legislature, the beneficiaries and the general public.
Delegation
The Board delegates authority consistent with the following principles:
Process Architecture
In exercising delegation, the Board follows a disciplined governance process:
Committees act on behalf of the Board in accordance with delegated authority and do not exercise management functions. Committees are accountable to:
Committees recommend but do not approve, unless explicitly authorized by the Board.
Verification provides objective evidence and is performed through independent functions, including:
Standing Committees
Operational Standards
The Board’s standing Committees shall operate under the terms of a charter approved by the Board and are set forth in this policy as follows:
Note: The chart below describes the approvals reserved for the SIB. The expectation is that Committees will perform the due diligence necessary to support a recommendation to the full board for its approval. The SIB needs to determine a multi-year calendar and then Committees need to organize their work accordingly. Continuing education should be linked to the calendar to be targeted and just-in-time taking into account the very busy schedules of members.
| Conduct Dimension | State Investment Board (Board) | Standing Committees (All Committees) |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Serves as the statutory governing body responsible for investment oversight, policy approval, delegation, and fiduciary accountability for all funds under N.D.C.C. Chapter 21-10. | Support the Board by providing focused research and recommendations, oversee performance and risk, verify and report to the SIB within delegated subject-matter areas. |
| Fiduciary Status | Acts as fiduciary with full statutory duties of care, loyalty, and prudence for funds under management. | Committee members act as fiduciaries when exercising delegated responsibilities on behalf of the Board. |
| Authority | Holds all authority granted by statute (N.D.C.C. Chapter 21-10); may delegate specific accountability while retaining ultimate responsibility. | Advise, oversee and verify only unless expressly delegated authority by the Board; may not bind the Board or exceed delegated scope. |
| Limitations | Authority constrained by statute, legislative appropriations, ethics laws, and open meetings requirements. Budget must be approved by the Legislature on a line by line basis biennially. | Authority limited to Board-approved charters; committees have no independent or implied powers. |
| Quorum | A majority of voting members (7) | A majority of voting members (2-3). The Committee will act only on the affirmative vote of the majority of the Committee members at a meeting. Should a quorum not be present the Chair will announce the absence of a quorum and the members will disburse. Approved meeting minutes of the Committee will be submitted to the SIB. |
| Voting | Section 4-4. Voting on matters before the SIB will be contained in the minutes which will show the recorded vote of each SIB member. | Same as the board. |
| Records | Section 4-6. A record of procedures will be kept by the Executive Director on all meetings of the SIB. The records of these proceedings are public documents, and copies will be distributed upon request. | Same as the board. |
| Meetings | Meets as required to fulfill statutory duties (at least quarterly); subject to ND open meetings law. Section 4-5. All meetings of the SIB are open to the public, except as allowed under North Dakota law. (NDCC 21-10-04) Meetings of the SIB may be called by the Chair or two members of the SIB upon reasonable notice in writing to the other members of the Board. Board members are expected to attend each meeting, in person or via tele- or videoconference. The Board may invite staff of the RIO, auditors or others to attend meetings, as necessary to provide information and to conduct business. Meetings will be conducted in accordance with NDCC 44-04-17.1. The Board may hold executive sessions as allowed under state law. Meeting materials must be provided in accessible formats. Presentations must not rely solely on visual content. Recordings and posted materials must be provided in accessible formats. | Same except the Governance and Policy Review Committee and the Executive Review Compensation Committee may meet semi-annually. |
| Meeting Agendas | Meeting agendas will be prepared by the Executive Director and approved by the Board Chair, unless otherwise directed by the Board, and will be provided to board members along with briefing materials (7) days before the scheduled board meeting. | Same — except agendas will be prepared by the Committee staff liaison, in coordination with the Executive Director. |
| Meeting Materials | Meeting materials should be distributed at least seven (7) days in advance. Members are encouraged to read the materials in advance as presentations should be based on that assumption. This is intended to reduce the time spent “presenting” materials and increase the time spent on dialogue. Materials should meet ADA Design Standards. | Same as the board. |
| Consent Agendas | The Board may use consent agendas to approve routine, non-controversial items in a single motion, without discussion—unless a member asks to pull an item for separate consideration. Typically, such matters are informational or procedural, have been reviewed in advance, or require no debate or decision trade-offs. | Same as the board. |
| Rules of Order | Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised except as superseded by-laws and Board governance policies. (Rosenberg) | Same as the board. |
| Reporting | Receives reports from Committees, staff, auditors, and external advisors. Reports should be exception-based wherever appropriate. Reports to the Legislature as required. | Reports regularly to the full Board; escalates material issues promptly. Reports should be decision-ready, clearly identifying: Issues; Options (least to most); Implications (pros and cons); Recommended actions. |
| Decision-Making | Makes final decisions unless authority is explicitly delegated. | Makes recommendations; decisions only where expressly delegated. |
| Self-Assessment | Conducts an annual Board self-assessment focused on fiduciary effectiveness and governance performance using a standardized, confidential survey and facilitated discussion, timed to inform governance planning and charter reviews, and result in a written summary of strengths, gaps, and prioritized improvement actions reported to the Board. Chair-specific questions should be mapped to duties such as agenda discipline; meeting facilitation; fiduciary focus; boundary enforcement; information flow; culture/behavior management. Confidential peer feedback should be compiled by GPRC and the results shared with Chair. | The GPRC conducts annual Board and Committee self-assessments focused on: effectiveness and clarity of delegation; clarity of roles and decision authority; quality, timeliness, and usefulness of information received; adequacy of time spent on strategic vs. operational matters; effectiveness of risk, performance, and policy oversight; Committee composition, expertise, and workload. Results should be summarized and shared with the Board, along with any recommended improvements. |
| Mentor | Each new trustee shall be assigned a mentor by the Chair in consultation with the Executive Director to aid in their onboarding. | NA |
| Continuing Education | Each trustee participates in ongoing fiduciary, investment, and governance education. The Board should specify the minimum number of hours of annual continuing education, an individualized curriculum and a method for tracking and reporting progress. The national average is about 10 hours. | Each Committee member shall complete continuing education aligned with the Committee’s responsibilities and required capabilities. |
| Charter / Governance Review | Approves governance framework and Committee charters; triennially reviews Board governance policies. | The GPRC will review the Committee charter at least triennially and recommend updates to the Board through the GPRC. |
| Accountability | Accountable to beneficiaries, Legislature, and the public for statutory compliance and long-term stewardship. | Accountable to the Board for researching and recommending policy, oversight of performance and risk within the delegated scope and verification and reporting to the Board. |
| Annual Workplans | The Board should create a multi-year workplan, cadence and calendar based on the approvals required by it. | Every standing Committee will create an at least annual plan to provide timely recommendations to the SIB according to the agreed upon board calendar. |
| Appointment | Members appointed or seated as provided in statute. | Committee members appointed by the Board Chair at the first SIB meeting in July of each year or when a vacancy arises. |
| Compensation | Section 4-8. SIB members, except elected and appointed officials, will be paid the amount specified in NDCC 21-10-01 per SIB meeting attended. Expenses will be paid according to state law and OMB policies. | Same as the board. |
| Leadership | Board Chair presides over board meetings and sets agendas in coordination with the Executive Director. | Committee Chairs / Vice-Chairs will be designated by the Board Chair. |
| Staff Support | Executive Director serves as primary liaison; senior staff support Board deliberations. | Executive Director designates senior staff liaisons appropriate to Committee scope. |
| Independent Advisors | The Board may retain independent advisors as required. | Same subject to Board approval |
| Terms | Board member terms are not set by statute. The only board members who have terms are the two members who have institutional investment experience. They have a 5-year term. There are no term limits. | Terms will be one year or termination of the term on the SIB. There are no term limits; Committee members serve at the pleasure of the Board. |
| Chair/Vice-Chair | 21-10-04. Board — Meetings. The State Investment Board shall select one of its members to serve as chair, one to serve as vice chair, and shall meet at the call of the chair or upon written notice signed by two members of the board. | The Board Chair will appoint a Committee Chair, and a Vice Chair. The Board Chair typically acts as the liaison. The Chair will preside at all meetings of the Committee. In the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair will perform the duties of the Chair. The Board Chair / Vice Chair may serve as ex officio members of all committees. |
| Election of Officers | Nomination: Self-nomination is allowed; no second is required. Voting threshold: A majority of members present and voting; there will be a runoff between top two if no majority. Voting method: Default recorded vote; any member may request secret ballot; the ED will record totals. Documentation: Candidates, vote totals, and outcomes will be recorded in the minutes. Officers may be re-elected. | |
| Ad hoc and Sub-Committees | The Board may form, and delegate authority to ad hoc or sub-committees when it deems appropriate. | Same as the board. |
| Committees | The Board Chair will propose a slate of Committee members for Board approval. The Board may also form an investment advisory council. | Investment; Audit & Risk; Governance Policy Review; Executive Review & Compensation; Budget & Finance |
| Vacancies | A vacancy occurs upon: written resignation effective date; removal from officer role; removal from Board membership; death; permanent incapacity; loss of eligibility; disqualifying legal status; or failure-to-attend. The ED will notify the Board within 5 business days; Chair notifies appointing authority within 10 business days. Holdovers: A member may continue to serve until a successor is appointed and qualified. A holdover should not exceed 90 days without written notice to the appointing authority. Staggered Appointments: Where appointment authority allows, the Board recommends staggered appointments and continuity planning to avoid simultaneous turnover. | |
| Independence | Not specified at the Board other than 21-10-09. Personal profit prohibited — Penalty. No member, officer, agent, or employee of the state investment board may profit in any manner from transactions on behalf of the funds. Any person violating any of the provisions of this § is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. See also Board members’ code of conduct. | External Investment Committee members shall be independent and free from material conflicts of interest. External members may not: have a current business relationship with investment managers, service providers, or counterparties used by the SIB; participate in decisions where a real or perceived conflict exists. Independence is reviewed at appointment and periodically thereafter. |
The Board’s standing Committees shall operate under the terms of a charter approved by the Board. The expectation is that Committees will perform the due diligence necessary to support a recommendation to the full Board for its approval. The SIB determines a multi-year calendar and Committees organize their work accordingly.
The Investment Committee (IC) is a standing Committee of the SIB. The IC will:
Collectively, members of the Committee should possess the following capabilities, and where gaps exist, a targeted continuing education plan shall be established to address them:
Staff Liaison: Chief Investment Officer
a. Long-Term Policy & Strategic Asset Allocation — Preserve strategic policy continuity and long-horizon return objectives.
b. Total Portfolio Risk & Active Risk Governance — Assure risks taken are intentional, measured, and aligned with policy.
c. Performance Measurement & Reporting Framework — Assure decision-quality information and consistent evaluation standards.
d. Investment Manager & Service Provider Oversight — Maintain accountability for delegated investment execution.
e. Implementation, Operations & Transition Oversight — Reduce execution risk and assure value is not lost in implementation.
f. Exception Management & Escalation — Assure timely visibility into deviations and emerging risks.
g. Market Intelligence & Continuous Learning — Support informed judgment in a changing environment.
Purpose: Assure the Board is timely informed of emerging investment, liquidity, operational, or governance risks that could materially affect long-term objectives or policy continuity.
The Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee (ARCC) is a standing Committee of the North Dakota State Investment Board established to support the Board’s fiduciary oversight of the North Dakota RIO by obtaining independent reassurance and verification and providing enterprise-wide performance risk oversight.
The Committee serves as the Board’s primary forum for oversight of enterprise risk management, internal and external audit, financial reporting and controls, and compliance with laws, regulations, and ethical standards, and as a communications link among the Board, RIO management, Internal Audit, independent auditors, and other reassurance providers.
ARCC’s role is oversight — not execution. The ARCC does not direct investment activity or operational execution, nor does it participate in management’s execution of controls, audits, or risk mitigation activities. Where matters intersect with investment operations, ARCC’s role is limited to independent oversight, reassurance, and verification, with primary responsibility residing with management and the Investment Committee. Investment operational matters remain Investment Committee-led, with ARCC providing independent oversight.
In fulfilling its mandate, the ARCC:
The ARCC has authority to approve the annual internal audit plan, recommend the selection, evaluation, or termination of independent external auditors, investigate any matter within its scope, and retain independent advisors as necessary. All approvals are limited to authority explicitly delegated by the Board.
The ARCC reports regularly to the Board on its activities, findings, risks, and recommendations; provides an annual written report describing how its responsibilities were discharged; and escalates significant risk, compliance, ethics, or audit matters to the Board as appropriate.
In overseeing the independent external audit, the ARCC reviews:
Collectively, ARCC members should have capabilities in the following areas, and where gaps exist, a targeted continuing education plan shall be established to address them:
Staff Liaison: Director of Audit (DA)
The ARCC oversees the enterprise risk management framework, including the identification, assessment, monitoring, and reporting of material financial, operational, compliance, technology, and reputational risks. Investment risks are the purview of the Investment Committee. The ARCC reviews management’s risk assessments, mitigation strategies, and reporting processes, and escalates material risk exposures to the Board as appropriate.
a. Internal Audit Services
b. Independent External Audit
c. Oversee Performance Risk Management
d. Verify Compliance
e. Whistleblower
f. Fraud, Abuse, Misuse
g. Other
The Governance & Policy Review Committee (GPRC) is a standing Committee of the North Dakota State Investment Board (SIB). The GPRC assists the Board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities by overseeing the integrity, coherence, and effectiveness of the Board’s governance framework.
The GPRC’s role is governance and policy stewardship, not management execution. The GPRC assures that Board policies remain clear, current, internally consistent, and aligned with fiduciary duties, statutory authority, and long-term objectives.
The GPRC is intentionally policy-centric rather than operational and serves as the Board’s institutional memory and governance steward. Its effectiveness is measured by improved clarity, consistency, fewer governance-related surprises, and stronger long-term decision discipline.
The GPRC shall periodically review the Board’s governance framework against recognized governance standards and leading practices and recommend enhancements as appropriate.
Collectively, members of the Committee should possess the following capabilities, and where gaps exist, a targeted continuing education plan shall be established to address them:
Staff Liaison: Executive Director
The GPRC shall conduct its own self-assessment and oversee the completion of annual self-assessments for the Board and all Committees and shall report the results to the Board.
Charter and Delegations Framework
The GPRC shall periodically review this Charter and all Committee charters (no less than every three years) and recommend updates to reflect: statutory or regulatory changes; evolving governance practices; Board priorities; clearer decision-making, delegation, and accountability; and delegations of authority.
The GPRC shall review and recommend Board delegations to Committees, the Executive Director, and staff, assuring that delegations are clearly defined, include appropriate limits and reporting expectations, and preserve Board accountability while enabling effective operations.
The GPRC may recommend governance enhancements that strengthen long-term stewardship, informed challenge, constructive Board–management relationships, and disciplined decision-making.
The Committee is not authorized to approve, except where explicitly delegated by the Board.
a. Governance Risk and Alignment
Material governance issues shall be elevated to the Board with clear recommendations.
b. Board Effectiveness and Development
The GPRC shall oversee processes that support effective Board performance, including: annual Board and Committee self-assessments; Trustee orientation and ongoing education expectations; and practices related to meeting effectiveness, agenda design, and the quality and timeliness of Board materials.
c. Governance Policy System
The GPRC shall oversee the design and coherence of the Board’s governance system, including governance policies, delegations of authority, Committee charters, and Board bylaws and procedures. The Committee shall monitor for gaps, overlaps, or ambiguity that could undermine fiduciary oversight.
d. Governance Policy Review Cycle
The GPRC shall establish and oversee a structured review cadence (no less than every three years) assuring reviews are risk-informed, aligned with statute and leading practice, and reflective of Board intent. Annual review does not imply annual revision.
a. Verification — The GPRC shall verify that governance documents clearly define roles, authorities, and accountability; distinguish Board oversight from management execution; and remain internally consistent and free of conflict or duplication.
b. Reporting — The GPRC shall report regularly to the Board regarding policy review activities, governance assessments, and recommendations for action. Recommendations shall be decision-ready and include rationale, implications, and alternatives where appropriate.
The Executive Review and Compensation Committee (ERCC) is a standing Committee of the State Investment Board. The ERCC will assist the SIB in fulfilling its fiduciary oversight responsibilities of “monitoring executive performance (which) is synonymous with monitoring organizational performance against Board policies.” The ERCC will also assist the SIB in developing compensation goals and strategies for the agency as a whole that are in alignment with the strategic plan of the agency.
The primary roles are to:
Collectively, ERCC members should possess the following capabilities, and where gaps exist, a targeted continuing education plan shall be established to address them:
Staff Liaison: Chief Legal Counsel (CLO) or third party for matters related to the Executive Director. The Executive Director will be the liaison for all other matters.
The Chief Legal Officer (CLO) or a third party will be responsible for the preparation of all ERCC materials related to the Executive Director’s Performance Evaluation and Compensation. The CLO or 3rd party will prepare an annual summary of the required reports submitted to the SIB by the Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer in connection with its review of policy adherence. The CLO or 3rd party will also assist the ERCC in completing annual surveys of the Executive Director with the SIB, SIB clients, and RIO team members.
The ERCC will conduct a formal evaluation of the Executive Director during the first half of every calendar year. This formal evaluation by the ERCC will serve as the basis for an annual compensation recommendation for the Executive Director only to be reviewed and approved by the SIB on or before June 30th each year.
The ERCC shall utilize an independent third-party advisor, as appropriate, to facilitate executive performance evaluations and compensation benchmarking to preserve objectivity and independence. Internal Audit may observe or verify process integrity but shall not lead executive performance assessments.
Prior to June 30th of each year:
The ERCC and/or RIO will seek SIB approval prior to formally engaging any third-party assistance in conducting the annual executive review process.
The ERCC is established by the SIB and has no power or authority to act on behalf of the full Board unless specifically delegated. The ERCC will abide by the provisions in the governance manual that pertain to the meetings and actions of the Board.
The ERCC shall oversee executive succession and leadership continuity frameworks for key executive roles, including the Executive Director, the Chief Investment Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to reduce key-person risk and support long-term organizational resilience.
Report the survey results to both the SIB and TFFR Board.
The Budget & Finance Committee (BFC) is a standing Committee of the SIB. It assists the SIB in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities for financial stewardship, resource alignment, and long-term organizational sustainability. The BFC’s role is oversight and assurance, not execution.
The BFC assures that the SIB’s budget, financial plans, and resource decisions are aligned with Board-approved priorities, statutory constraints, and the long-term ability of the organization to carry out its investment and fiduciary mandate.
The BFC is forward-looking, not transactional. Its success is measured by: fewer budget surprises; clear linkage between strategy and resources; stronger long-term organizational capacity; and providing the Board with a disciplined forum to address resource trade-offs explicitly, rather than implicitly through risk or performance outcomes.
The BFC does not evaluate internal controls, accounting judgments, or audit findings, which remain within the purview of the ARCC. The BFC may rely on ARCC assurance in assessing financial sustainability.
The BFC shall consider the budget and financial plans over a multi-year horizon, including the forward implications of staffing, compensation, technology, and vendor commitments.
The BFC shall coordinate with the ERCC to assure compensation structures and staffing plans are financially sustainable and aligned with approved resource levels.
Collectively, BFC members should have the following capabilities, and where gaps exist, a targeted continuing education plan shall be established to address them:
Staff Liaison: The Chief Financial and Operating Officer
Financial Policy (Non-Investment)
The BFC shall review and recommend Board-level financial policies, including budget principles, reserve or contingency policies (if applicable), and cost allocation methodologies. Financial policies shall support long-term stewardship, be internally consistent with governance and delegation policies, and not conflict with investment policy (IC) or audit controls (ARCC).
Budget Recommendation
The BFC shall review management’s proposed annual operating budget and biennial or multi-year financial plans (as applicable), assess whether proposed budgets align with Board priorities and policies, support effective execution of the investment program, and are realistic given statutory appropriation constraints, and recommend the budget to the full Board for approval prior to submission to the Legislature as required.
The BFC has authority to research and recommend. It does not approve expenditures, direct management spending decisions, manage staff or vendors, or negotiate contracts. It may request information, analyses, and scenario modeling from management and may recommend engagement of external advisors, subject to Board approval.
A. Financial Performance & Monitoring
The BFC shall oversee exception-based reporting of actual vs. budgeted expenditures, material variances and their drivers, and trends in cost structure over time. It shall monitor financial sustainability indicators, including staffing and compensation capacity, technology and systems funding, and vendor and external service costs, and escalate material budgetary risks or pressures to the full Board.
B. Resource Adequacy & Organizational Capacity
The BFC shall evaluate whether financial resources are sufficient to support the complexity and scale of assets under management, internal investment management and oversight, and risk management, compliance, audit, and data capabilities. It shall consider benchmarking inputs (e.g., peer systems, AUM-per-FTE, budget per $AUM) as context, not determinative metrics, and advise the Board on resource trade-offs that may affect investment performance, risk exposure, and organizational resilience.
C. Statutory & Appropriation Alignment
The BFC shall oversee alignment of the budget with legislative appropriation authority, continuing appropriation provisions, and applicable fiscal statutes and policies; monitor constraints or risks arising from line-item appropriations, hiring or compensation limitations, and procurement or technology funding restrictions; and coordinate as appropriate with management, legal counsel, and legislative or oversight bodies (through the Board).
The BFC shall report regularly to the full Board on: budget recommendations; financial performance and material variances; resource adequacy risks; and policy recommendations related to financial stewardship.
The Decision Register — a complete inventory of key Board approvals, organized by committee and cadence.
Decision Architecture
The GPS introduces a Decision Register — a catalogued inventory of the major decisions the Board makes, organized by type, frequency, and required authority level. The Board makes at least 60 major governance decisions over any five-year period.
To support each major decision, the GPS introduces Just-in-Time Peer Intelligence Reports and curated board insights — providing relevant context and suggested questions to ask in advance of each significant vote or action.
The Five Powers: Conduct, Set/Approve, Delegate, Oversee, and Verify & Report. Together, they frame every decision in the register. Committees perform due diligence and recommend; the SIB approves.
Decision Architecture
The Governance Policy System is designed to assure that the State Investment Board exercises its fiduciary authority in a disciplined, transparent, and repeatable manner across multiple years. At the core of the Governance Policy System are two reinforcing governance tools:
Together, these tools establish a five-year governance cycle that organizes the Board’s fiduciary responsibilities into a structured sequence of decisions, oversight activities, and policy refinements. This approach assures that the Board governs proactively rather than reactively, maintains disciplined oversight of delegated authority, and continuously improves the governance framework over time.
The Decision Registry is the central operating instrument of the Governance Policy System. It is a structured record that identifies, documents, and schedules all key Board decisions required to govern the investment program and the organization.
The Decision Registry assures that every significant Board decision is prepared through an appropriate governance process, including committee due diligence, expert analysis, and independent verification where appropriate.
Full Register
| Policy Area | Due Diligence / Recommend | Cadence |
|---|---|---|
| Governance & Policy Review Committee | ||
| Governance, Authority & Controls | Election of Officers | Y1 |
| Delegation of Authority | Y3 | |
| Delegation of Authority Matrix | Y3 | |
| Annual Governance Calendar | Y1 | |
| Committee Charters | Y3 | |
| Governance Policies & Code of Conduct | Y3 | |
| Conflict of Interest Determinations | Y1 | |
| Policy Review Schedule | Y3 | |
| Exception Requests to Policy | AN | |
| Hiring / Termination of Fiduciary Advisors & Governance Advisors | Y5 | |
| Extraordinary & Non-Routine | Response to Governance Failure or Breach | AN |
| Legal Counsel | AN | |
| Declaration of Emergency Authority | AN | |
| Litigation Strategy | AN | |
| Escalation of an Issue to Legislature | AN | |
| Settlement or Indemnification | AN | |
| Investment Committee | ||
| Investment Strategy | Investment Beliefs | Y5 |
| Long-term Objectives & Risk Appetite | Y5 | |
| Asset Allocation Policy | Y4 | |
| Strategic Asset Allocation Targets | Y4 | |
| Use of Leverage / Derivatives / Alternatives | Y5 | |
| Deviation from Investment Policy | Y5 | |
| Hiring / Termination of Custodian & Master Service Providers | Y5 | |
| Portfolio Structure & Risk | Active Risk / Tracking Error Limits | Y5 |
| Liquidity Framework | Y5 | |
| Concentration Limits | Y5 | |
| Capital Development Pacing | Y1 | |
| Stress Testing & Scenario Framework | Y1 | |
| Rebalancing Policy | Y5 | |
| Response to Market Stress | Y1 | |
| Response to Liquidity Event | Y1 | |
| Benchmarks & Performance | Benchmarks & Reference Portfolios | Y1 |
| Performance & Evaluation Measures | Y5 | |
| Underperformance Thresholds & Watch Lists | Y1 | |
| Manager Hiring and Termination Criteria | Y5 | |
| Long-Term Funding Status | Y1 | |
| Investment & Risk Dashboards | Y1 | |
| Executive Review & Compensation Committee | ||
| Leadership & Talent | Hiring / Termination of the Chief Executive | AN |
| Executive Compensation Plan | Y1 | |
| Incentive & Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) | Y1 | |
| Performance Goals for the Chief Executive | Y1 | |
| Succession Plan | Y3 | |
| Budget & Finance Committee | ||
| Financial & Operational Stewardship | Annual Operating Budget for Legislative Approval | Y2 |
| Staffing Levels & Key Positions for Legislative Approval | Y2 | |
| Fee & Expense Policy (only applicable if 'off books') | AN | |
| Cost Allocation Methodology | Y1 | |
| Capital Expenditures (Continuing Authority) | AN | |
| Variances Beyond Budget (only applicable if 'off books') | Q | |
| Audit, Risk & Compliance | ||
| Accountability & Transparency | Hiring / Termination of Director of Audit | AN |
| External Auditor Appointment (if permitted) | AN | |
| Risk Management Framework | Y1 | |
| Internal Audit Plans | Y1 | |
| Internal Audit Findings | Y1 | |
| Corrective Action Plans | Y1 | |
| Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties | Y1 | |
Committees perform the due diligence necessary to support a recommendation to the full Board for its approval. The SIB determines a multi-year calendar and Committees organize their work accordingly. Just-in-Time intelligence and insights are linked to the calendar.
Triggers
The key is not cadence length. The key is discipline around triggers.
Event-driven items activate outside the calendar — emergency authority, litigation, CE hiring, market stress events.
Market drawdowns do not qualify.
Short-term performance deviations within expected variance and routine operational matters within delegated authority are not event-driven triggers.
Calendar cadence rationale for each GPS approval item. The key is not cadence length — the key is discipline around triggers.
Timing Philosophy
The Governance Cycle is the structured multi-year timing and cadence through which the Board fulfills its fiduciary responsibilities. The Governance Cycle is designed to span five years, with individual decisions occurring on annual, biennial, or multi-year intervals depending on their importance and statutory or fiduciary requirements.
The cycle organizes governance activities into a continuous decision-making loop, assuring that policies remain current, delegated authority is monitored, and performance outcomes inform future decisions. The Governance Policy System organizes the Board’s activities by its powers:
Subject to governing statutes, the Board determines how it will conduct business, make decisions collectively, and delegate to committees and the Executive Director. This stage is where agendas and calendars are set, committee assignments are made, and self-evaluations are scheduled.
The Board establishes policy direction and strategic objectives, defining its expectations regarding organizational mission and strategic priorities, investment policy and risk appetite, governance policies and the delegation framework, and fiduciary standards and performance objectives. Committees may assist in developing policy proposals, but policy authority remains exclusively with the Board.
Following committee review and due diligence, the Board formally approves policies and strategic decisions. Once approved, the Board delegates the authority and resources necessary to implement the decision — including authority to the Executive Director and senior staff, implementation responsibility within the Retirement and Investment Office, and defined reporting requirements and performance expectations. Delegation is always accompanied by clear accountability and monitoring expectations.
The Executive Director and staff implement Board policies and decisions. Committees may monitor implementation progress but do not manage operations. The Board and its committees oversee performance, practices, and controls associated with delegated authority, performing oversight within their areas of responsibility and reporting findings to the Board through performance reports, risk monitoring reports, financial condition reviews, operational updates, and strategic progress reports.
Independent assurance mechanisms provide verification of results and governance practices — including internal audit reviews, external audit reports, independent investment performance analysis, governance reviews, and legal and compliance reviews. Committees review independent auditor and advisor reports and present conclusions and recommendations to the Board. The Board evaluates whether policies remain appropriate, whether delegated authority has been exercised prudently, and whether governance practices require refinement. Where necessary, the Board updates policies or governance structures, beginning the next cycle of governance decision-making.
The Governance Cycle creates a continuous improvement loop in which each stage informs the next: Policy Direction → Approval and Delegation → Implementation → Oversight → Verification → Reporting and Policy Refinement. This cycle assures that governance evolves based on evidence, oversight findings, and strategic priorities rather than ad-hoc decision making.
The Governance Cycle is operationalized through a multi-year governance calendar derived from the Decision Registry. The calendar schedules Board approvals and oversight activities, aligns committee work plans with Board decision timing, assures that decisions occur with sufficient preparation and due diligence, and distributes governance workload evenly across the year. Some decisions occur annually, while others follow multi-year cycles.
The full Governance Calendar is available on RIO’s website at www.rio.nd.gov, and is also provided in interactive form in the Governance Calendar Explorer below.
Timing Philosophy
The decision calendar and cadence was previously undefined. Part 5 of the GPS establishes when decisions are made — creating predictability and preparation time for board members, staff, and committees. The Decision Calendar gives the Board a prospective view of what is coming and when.
Timing is governance. Knowing when a decision arrives is as important as knowing who makes it or how it flows through the authority structure.
5-Year Cycle
Structural Policy
Structural policy framework item. Reviewed on a 5-year cycle consistent with long-horizon strategic governance practice.
e.g. Investment beliefs, Asset allocation policy, Strategic asset allocation targets
3–4 Year Cycle
Core Governance
Core governance or risk framework. Refreshed every 3–4 years to balance stability and responsiveness.
e.g. Risk frameworks, Benchmarks, Committee Charters, Manager criteria, Governance policies
Biennial (2-Year)
Authority Calibration
Authority or structural calibration item. Reviewed biennially, often aligned with ND legislative session.
e.g. Delegation of Authority, Operating Budget, Staffing Levels, Fee Policy
Annual
Statutory & Operational
Annual statutory, fiduciary, or operational requirement aligned with audit/funding cycle.
e.g. Governance Calendar, Compliance certification, Executive Comp Plan, Succession Plan, Funding status
Quarterly / Monthly
Ongoing Oversight
Oversight function requiring quarterly board visibility and monitoring of performance compared to policy.
e.g. Corrective Action Plans, Investment & risk dashboards
As Needed / Event-Driven
Triggered Decisions
Event-driven decision triggered by circumstances rather than calendar schedule.
e.g. Deviation from investment policy, Emergency Authority, Litigation, Settlement, CE hiring / termination
Event Triggers
The key is not cadence length. The key is discipline around triggers. Event-driven items activate outside the calendar — emergency authority, litigation, CE hiring, market stress events.
Board & Committee Schedule
This is the State Investment Board’s working governance calendar for the full Board and all six standing committees. It is organized on a fiscal-year basis (July 1 – June 30) and runs on a recurring five-year cycle, so that annual and quarterly business repeats each year while structural reviews surface in the year they are due.
Use the explorer below to see what each body decides, and when. Filter by body, year, or quarter, narrow by cadence (how often an item recurs), or search across topics, actions, and rationale. Every item shows the decision or action expected and a short note on why it falls in that part of the year. As-needed, event-driven matters are listed separately, since they activate on a trigger rather than on the calendar.
Showing 528 of 528 scheduled items
Q1 · Jul–Sep
Election of Board Officers (Chair, Vice Chair)
Elect Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year
First meeting after July 1 each year (NDCC 21-10-04). Q1 = fiscal year opening.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and approve
Approve calendar of Board and Committee meetings and decision schedule
Set at annual organizational meeting (Q1, first meeting of new FY).
Conflict of Interest Determinations – annual review
Receive and act on annual COI disclosures; approve any determinations
Annual affirmation from all trustees and staff at FY opening (Q1).
Investment Policy Statement – approval of annual benchmarks
Approve annual benchmark recommendations from IC and independent consultant
Q1: New FY benchmarks in effect July 1; IC recommends, consultant verifies.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Approve ED performance goals for the upcoming fiscal year
Q1: Goals set at start of new FY (July 1) to guide year-long evaluation.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Approve cost allocation methodology across all 29 client funds
Q1: New FY cost allocations effective July 1; BFC recommends.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Approve updated enterprise risk management (ERM) framework
Q1: Framework refreshed at FY start; ARCC recommends to Board.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Performance & Evaluation Measures – annual review
Confirm or adjust evaluation methodologies and performance attribution
Q1: Confirmed at start of new FY.
Underperformance Thresholds & Watch Lists – annual reset
Approve updated thresholds; confirm or update manager watch list
Q1: Reset at FY open; triggers escalation to SIB when breached.
Investment Beliefs – full review and reaffirmation
Recommend affirmed or revised Investment Beliefs to SIB
Q1 of 5-year cycle; foundational; SIB approves Q2.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Recommend updated ERM framework to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; includes risk appetite and escalation protocols.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures – review annual affirmations
Review trustee and staff COI affirmations; report compliance status to SIB
Q1: Annual affirmation at FY opening; concurrent with Board COI review.
Policy Review Schedule – update and maintain
Confirm policy review schedule and assign ownership for upcoming reviews
Q1: Set at FY opening; rolling 3-year review plan.
Committee Charters – triennial review
Recommend updated Committee Charters to SIB
Q1: Review during summer/fall; SIB acts Q2.
Delegation of Authority – triennial review
Recommend updated Delegation of Authority to SIB
Q1: Reviewed with charters; SIB approves Q2.
Hiring / Termination of Fiduciary Advisors
Recommend engagement or termination of governance/legal advisors to SIB
Q1: 5-year RFP cycle; event-driven otherwise.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Financial Policies Review – budget principles, reserves
Recommend updated Board-level financial policies to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; GPS p. 55.
Q2 · Oct–Dec
Delegation of Authority – full triennial review
Approve Delegation of Authority to Executive Director and Committees
Q2 (Oct-Dec): GPRC completes summer review; Board acts in fall.
Delegation of Authority Matrix – full triennial review
Approve updated Delegation of Authority Matrix
Reviewed jointly with Delegation of Authority; Q2.
Committee Charters – triennial review and update
Approve revised Committee Charters (all 5 committees)
GPRC leads summer review; Board approves Q2 (Oct-Dec).
Policy Review Schedule – approve triennial review plan
Approve 3-year rolling policy review schedule
Set with charter and delegation reviews each triennial cycle.
Hiring / Termination of Governance and Fiduciary Advisors
Approve engagement or termination of governance and fiduciary advisors
5-year RFP review; Q2 to allow summer evaluation period.
Investment Beliefs – 5-year reaffirmation
Affirm or revise Board's investment beliefs statement
Q2: Foundational review early in 5-year cycle; IC recommends.
Annual Operating Budget – biennial approval for Legislature
Approve biennial operating budget for submission to ND Legislature
Q2 (Oct-Dec): ND Legislature convenes odd-year Jan sessions; budget submitted fall.
Staffing Levels & Key Positions – biennial approval
Approve staffing plan and key positions for legislative submission
Submitted with biennial budget request Q2; aligned with legislative calendar.
Internal Audit Findings – annual summary
Receive and act on material audit findings; approve corrective action plans
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Year-end audit concludes summer; results presented fall.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive annual compliance certification from management
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
Financial Statements – annual review and release approval
Approve release of annual financial statements to SIB and public
Q2: Audit of prior FY (ended June 30) typically complete by Oct-Dec.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Long-Term Funding Status – actuarial update (TFFR, PERS)
Receive funded status report; identify implications for asset allocation
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Actuarial valuations as of June 30 typically complete by fall.
Stress Testing & Scenario Framework – annual update
Approve stress test scenarios for the coming year
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Based on updated economic outlook after FY close.
Asset Allocation Policy – full review
Recommend updated Asset Allocation Policy to SIB for approval
Q2: Deep liability and peer review in fall; SIB acts Q3.
Long-term Objectives & Risk Appetite – 5-year review
Recommend updated long-term objectives and risk appetite to SIB
Q2: Follows investment beliefs; drives SAA and active risk for cycle.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Internal Audit Findings – annual report
Receive annual audit results; escalate significant findings to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Audit of FY ended June 30 typically complete by fall.
Director of Audit Annual Attestation – independence affirmation
Receive written attestation from the Director of Audit that no undue influence has been exerted
Q2: Concurrent with annual audit findings report; GPS p. 46.
Financial Statements – pre-release review with auditors
Receive financial statements; confirm accuracy and approve release
Q2 (Oct-Dec): FY-end audit complete; ARCC reviews before public release.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive management certification; report status to SIB
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
ARCC Annual Written Report to SIB
Approve and submit annual ARCC report describing responsibilities and activities
Q2: Describes prior FY activities; GPS p. 42.
Governance Policy Review Cycle – confirm cadence
Confirm review cadence remains appropriate; recommend changes if warranted
Q2: Annual review does not imply annual revision; GPS p. 49.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – annual review and payouts
Recommend LTIP structure and authorize prior-year payouts to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): 3-year rolling performance periods; payout after FY close.
Policy Adherence Summary & Surveys – annual report
Present survey results and policy adherence summary to SIB and TFFR Board
Q2: CLO/third party prepares; covers SIB client and RIO team surveys after FY close.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Multi-Year Financial Outlook – forward implications review
Present 3-year financial projections to SIB; identify funding risks
Q2 (Oct-Dec): After FY close; forward view covering staffing, technology, vendors.
Annual Operating Budget – biennial preparation for Legislature
Recommend biennial operating budget to SIB for legislative submission
Q2 (Oct-Dec): ND Legislature convenes odd-year Jan; budget submitted fall preceding session.
Staffing Levels & Key Positions – biennial recommendation
Recommend staffing plan to SIB for legislative submission
Q2: Coordinates with ERCC on compensation sustainability; submitted with budget.
Q3 · Jan–Mar
Asset Allocation Policy – 4-year formal review
Approve updated Asset Allocation Policy for all client funds
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Deep review during legislative session off-season; IC recommends.
Long-term Objectives & Risk Appetite – 5-year review
Approve long-term return objectives and total fund risk appetite
Q3: Follows investment beliefs; drives SAA and active risk for cycle.
Executive Succession Plan – triennial review
Approve updated succession framework for ED, CIO, and CFO
Q3: Allows time to integrate with annual comp/evaluation cycle in Q4.
Annual Board Self-Assessment – administer and report results
Receive GPRC self-assessment report; approve improvement priorities
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year assessment allows improvements before FY close.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Strategic Asset Allocation Targets – full review
Recommend updated SAA targets for each client fund to SIB
Q3: Follows Asset Allocation Policy; SIB approves Q4 for July 1 effect.
Active Risk / Tracking Error Limits – 5-year review
Recommend updated active risk limits to SIB
Q3: Follows risk appetite decision.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Board & Committee Self-Assessment – administer and report
Report self-assessment results and recommend improvement priorities to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-FY assessment allows improvements before year-end.
Governance Risk & Alignment Report
Report material governance risks and recommended actions to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year report; includes statutory and regulatory monitoring.
RIO Compensation Policy – annual review and recommendation
Recommend compensation policy updates to SIB; confirm market competitiveness
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Informs Q4 ICP recommendation and budget planning.
Executive Succession Plan – triennial review
Recommend updated succession framework for ED, CIO, CFO to SIB
Q3: Allows integration with Q4 compensation and goals cycle.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Q4 · Apr–Jun
Strategic Asset Allocation Targets – 4-year review
Approve SAA targets for Legacy Fund, PERS, TFFR, and WSI
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Follows asset allocation policy; effective July 1 new FY.
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – annual
Approve annual performance evaluation of the Executive Director
MUST be approved by June 30 (end of Q4). ERCC leads formal evaluation.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Approve Executive Director compensation for coming year
By June 30 (end of Q4); effective July 1 new fiscal year.
Incentive Compensation Plan – annual review and approval
Approve annual incentive compensation plan and ICM for all covered staff
Approved Q4 (Apr-Jun) to take effect July 1. ICM verified by independent consultant.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based internal audit work plan for the fiscal year
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Plan approved before fiscal year start (July 1); ARCC approves.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Benchmark Review – recommend to SIB
Recommend annual benchmarks to SIB for approval
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Consultant verifies; SIB approves; effective July 1.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based audit work plan and use of any third-party support
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1 start of new FY. Only item ARCC explicitly approves.
External Audit – scope and approach review
Review external auditor's proposed scope; coordinate with internal audit
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Scope agreed before June 30 FY end for timely audit commencement.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and recommend
Recommend annual calendar of Board and Committee decisions to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Prepared for SIB approval at Q1 organizational meeting.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Recommend ED performance goals to SIB for approval before fiscal year start
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Goals set before July 1 so they govern the entire new FY.
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – formal annual review
Recommend approval of formal ED evaluation to SIB (by June 30)
MUST be completed Q4 by June 30 (GPS p. 52). CLO/third party leads.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Recommend ED compensation to SIB for approval (by June 30)
Q4: Based on evaluation; new compensation effective July 1.
Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) – annual review and recommendation
Recommend annual ICP, ICM, and maximum incentive levels to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): SIB approves before July 1; ICM verified by independent consultant.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Recommend updated cost allocation methodology across 29 client funds to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1; effective for new FY.
Q1 · Jul–Sep
Election of Board Officers (Chair, Vice Chair)
Elect Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year
First meeting after July 1 each year (NDCC 21-10-04). Q1 = fiscal year opening.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and approve
Approve calendar of Board and Committee meetings and decision schedule
Set at annual organizational meeting (Q1, first meeting of new FY).
Conflict of Interest Determinations – annual review
Receive and act on annual COI disclosures; approve any determinations
Annual affirmation from all trustees and staff at FY opening (Q1).
Investment Policy Statement – approval of annual benchmarks
Approve annual benchmark recommendations from IC and independent consultant
Q1: New FY benchmarks in effect July 1; IC recommends, consultant verifies.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Approve ED performance goals for the upcoming fiscal year
Q1: Goals set at start of new FY (July 1) to guide year-long evaluation.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Approve cost allocation methodology across all 29 client funds
Q1: New FY cost allocations effective July 1; BFC recommends.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Approve updated enterprise risk management (ERM) framework
Q1: Framework refreshed at FY start; ARCC recommends to Board.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Performance & Evaluation Measures – annual review
Confirm or adjust evaluation methodologies and performance attribution
Q1: Confirmed at start of new FY.
Underperformance Thresholds & Watch Lists – annual reset
Approve updated thresholds; confirm or update manager watch list
Q1: Reset at FY open; triggers escalation to SIB when breached.
Liquidity Framework – 5-year review
Recommend updated liquidity framework and minimum liquidity requirements
Q1 of Y2 in cycle; covers all client funds' differing liquidity profiles.
Rebalancing Policy – 5-year review
Recommend updated rebalancing policy and trigger thresholds
Q1: Effective with new FY; corridor bands and frequency.
Use of Leverage / Derivatives / Alternatives – policy review
Recommend updated policy on use of leverage, derivatives, and alternatives
IC recommends; SIB approves.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Recommend updated ERM framework to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; includes risk appetite and escalation protocols.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures – review annual affirmations
Review trustee and staff COI affirmations; report compliance status to SIB
Q1: Annual affirmation at FY opening; concurrent with Board COI review.
Policy Review Schedule – update and maintain
Confirm policy review schedule and assign ownership for upcoming reviews
Q1: Set at FY opening; rolling 3-year review plan.
Governance Policies & Code of Conduct – triennial review
Recommend updated GPS manual and Code of Conduct to SIB
Q1 of Y2/Y5 (staggered from charter review); SIB approves Q2.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Financial Policies Review – budget principles, reserves
Recommend updated Board-level financial policies to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; GPS p. 55.
Q2 · Oct–Dec
Governance Policies & Code of Conduct – triennial review
Approve updated Governance Policy System manual and Code of Conduct
Staggered from charter review by one cycle; Q2 of Y2/Y5.
Use of Leverage / Derivatives / Alternatives – policy review
Approve or reaffirm policy on leverage, derivatives, and alternative investments
5-year fundamental risk policy item.
Internal Audit Findings – annual summary
Receive and act on material audit findings; approve corrective action plans
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Year-end audit concludes summer; results presented fall.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive annual compliance certification from management
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
Financial Statements – annual review and release approval
Approve release of annual financial statements to SIB and public
Q2: Audit of prior FY (ended June 30) typically complete by Oct-Dec.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Long-Term Funding Status – actuarial update (TFFR, PERS)
Receive funded status report; identify implications for asset allocation
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Actuarial valuations as of June 30 typically complete by fall.
Stress Testing & Scenario Framework – annual update
Approve stress test scenarios for the coming year
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Based on updated economic outlook after FY close.
Concentration Limits – 5-year review
Recommend updated concentration limits by asset class and manager
Q2: Single-manager and single-security limits.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Internal Audit Findings – annual report
Receive annual audit results; escalate significant findings to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Audit of FY ended June 30 typically complete by fall.
Director of Audit Annual Attestation – independence affirmation
Receive written attestation from the Director of Audit that no undue influence has been exerted
Q2: Concurrent with annual audit findings report; GPS p. 46.
Financial Statements – pre-release review with auditors
Receive financial statements; confirm accuracy and approve release
Q2 (Oct-Dec): FY-end audit complete; ARCC reviews before public release.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive management certification; report status to SIB
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
ARCC Annual Written Report to SIB
Approve and submit annual ARCC report describing responsibilities and activities
Q2: Describes prior FY activities; GPS p. 42.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – annual review and payouts
Recommend LTIP structure and authorize prior-year payouts to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): 3-year rolling performance periods; payout after FY close.
Policy Adherence Summary & Surveys – annual report
Present survey results and policy adherence summary to SIB and TFFR Board
Q2: CLO/third party prepares; covers SIB client and RIO team surveys after FY close.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Multi-Year Financial Outlook – forward implications review
Present 3-year financial projections to SIB; identify funding risks
Q2 (Oct-Dec): After FY close; forward view covering staffing, technology, vendors.
Q3 · Jan–Mar
Annual Board Self-Assessment – administer and report results
Receive GPRC self-assessment report; approve improvement priorities
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year assessment allows improvements before FY close.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Board & Committee Self-Assessment – administer and report
Report self-assessment results and recommend improvement priorities to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-FY assessment allows improvements before year-end.
Governance Risk & Alignment Report
Report material governance risks and recommended actions to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year report; includes statutory and regulatory monitoring.
RIO Compensation Policy – annual review and recommendation
Recommend compensation policy updates to SIB; confirm market competitiveness
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Informs Q4 ICP recommendation and budget planning.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Q4 · Apr–Jun
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – annual
Approve annual performance evaluation of the Executive Director
MUST be approved by June 30 (end of Q4). ERCC leads formal evaluation.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Approve Executive Director compensation for coming year
By June 30 (end of Q4); effective July 1 new fiscal year.
Incentive Compensation Plan – annual review and approval
Approve annual incentive compensation plan and ICM for all covered staff
Approved Q4 (Apr-Jun) to take effect July 1. ICM verified by independent consultant.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based internal audit work plan for the fiscal year
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Plan approved before fiscal year start (July 1); ARCC approves.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Benchmark Review – recommend to SIB
Recommend annual benchmarks to SIB for approval
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Consultant verifies; SIB approves; effective July 1.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based audit work plan and use of any third-party support
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1 start of new FY. Only item ARCC explicitly approves.
External Audit – scope and approach review
Review external auditor's proposed scope; coordinate with internal audit
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Scope agreed before June 30 FY end for timely audit commencement.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and recommend
Recommend annual calendar of Board and Committee decisions to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Prepared for SIB approval at Q1 organizational meeting.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Recommend ED performance goals to SIB for approval before fiscal year start
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Goals set before July 1 so they govern the entire new FY.
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – formal annual review
Recommend approval of formal ED evaluation to SIB (by June 30)
MUST be completed Q4 by June 30 (GPS p. 52). CLO/third party leads.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Recommend ED compensation to SIB for approval (by June 30)
Q4: Based on evaluation; new compensation effective July 1.
Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) – annual review and recommendation
Recommend annual ICP, ICM, and maximum incentive levels to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): SIB approves before July 1; ICM verified by independent consultant.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Recommend updated cost allocation methodology across 29 client funds to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1; effective for new FY.
Q1 · Jul–Sep
Election of Board Officers (Chair, Vice Chair)
Elect Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year
First meeting after July 1 each year (NDCC 21-10-04). Q1 = fiscal year opening.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and approve
Approve calendar of Board and Committee meetings and decision schedule
Set at annual organizational meeting (Q1, first meeting of new FY).
Conflict of Interest Determinations – annual review
Receive and act on annual COI disclosures; approve any determinations
Annual affirmation from all trustees and staff at FY opening (Q1).
Investment Policy Statement – approval of annual benchmarks
Approve annual benchmark recommendations from IC and independent consultant
Q1: New FY benchmarks in effect July 1; IC recommends, consultant verifies.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Approve ED performance goals for the upcoming fiscal year
Q1: Goals set at start of new FY (July 1) to guide year-long evaluation.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Approve cost allocation methodology across all 29 client funds
Q1: New FY cost allocations effective July 1; BFC recommends.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Approve updated enterprise risk management (ERM) framework
Q1: Framework refreshed at FY start; ARCC recommends to Board.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Performance & Evaluation Measures – annual review
Confirm or adjust evaluation methodologies and performance attribution
Q1: Confirmed at start of new FY.
Underperformance Thresholds & Watch Lists – annual reset
Approve updated thresholds; confirm or update manager watch list
Q1: Reset at FY open; triggers escalation to SIB when breached.
Manager Hiring and Termination Criteria – 5-year review
Recommend updated manager evaluation criteria and termination thresholds
Q1: Covers both internal and external managers.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Recommend updated ERM framework to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; includes risk appetite and escalation protocols.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures – review annual affirmations
Review trustee and staff COI affirmations; report compliance status to SIB
Q1: Annual affirmation at FY opening; concurrent with Board COI review.
Policy Review Schedule – update and maintain
Confirm policy review schedule and assign ownership for upcoming reviews
Q1: Set at FY opening; rolling 3-year review plan.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Financial Policies Review – budget principles, reserves
Recommend updated Board-level financial policies to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; GPS p. 55.
Q2 · Oct–Dec
Hiring / Termination of Custodian & Master Service Providers
Approve engagement or termination of custodian and master service providers
5-year RFP cycle; IC recommends; event-driven otherwise.
Annual Operating Budget – biennial approval for Legislature
Approve biennial operating budget for submission to ND Legislature
Q2 (Oct-Dec): ND Legislature convenes odd-year Jan sessions; budget submitted fall.
Staffing Levels & Key Positions – biennial approval
Approve staffing plan and key positions for legislative submission
Submitted with biennial budget request Q2; aligned with legislative calendar.
Internal Audit Findings – annual summary
Receive and act on material audit findings; approve corrective action plans
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Year-end audit concludes summer; results presented fall.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive annual compliance certification from management
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
Financial Statements – annual review and release approval
Approve release of annual financial statements to SIB and public
Q2: Audit of prior FY (ended June 30) typically complete by Oct-Dec.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Long-Term Funding Status – actuarial update (TFFR, PERS)
Receive funded status report; identify implications for asset allocation
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Actuarial valuations as of June 30 typically complete by fall.
Stress Testing & Scenario Framework – annual update
Approve stress test scenarios for the coming year
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Based on updated economic outlook after FY close.
Performance & Evaluation Framework – 5-year comprehensive review
Recommend updated performance evaluation framework to SIB
Q2: Attribution, peer comparison, and reporting standards.
Hiring / Termination of Custodian & Master Service Providers
Recommend custodian and master service provider engagement/termination to SIB
Full RFP every 5 years; Q2 allows summer evaluation.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Internal Audit Findings – annual report
Receive annual audit results; escalate significant findings to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Audit of FY ended June 30 typically complete by fall.
Director of Audit Annual Attestation – independence affirmation
Receive written attestation from the Director of Audit that no undue influence has been exerted
Q2: Concurrent with annual audit findings report; GPS p. 46.
Financial Statements – pre-release review with auditors
Receive financial statements; confirm accuracy and approve release
Q2 (Oct-Dec): FY-end audit complete; ARCC reviews before public release.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive management certification; report status to SIB
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
ARCC Annual Written Report to SIB
Approve and submit annual ARCC report describing responsibilities and activities
Q2: Describes prior FY activities; GPS p. 42.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – annual review and payouts
Recommend LTIP structure and authorize prior-year payouts to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): 3-year rolling performance periods; payout after FY close.
Policy Adherence Summary & Surveys – annual report
Present survey results and policy adherence summary to SIB and TFFR Board
Q2: CLO/third party prepares; covers SIB client and RIO team surveys after FY close.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Multi-Year Financial Outlook – forward implications review
Present 3-year financial projections to SIB; identify funding risks
Q2 (Oct-Dec): After FY close; forward view covering staffing, technology, vendors.
Annual Operating Budget – biennial preparation for Legislature
Recommend biennial operating budget to SIB for legislative submission
Q2 (Oct-Dec): ND Legislature convenes odd-year Jan; budget submitted fall preceding session.
Staffing Levels & Key Positions – biennial recommendation
Recommend staffing plan to SIB for legislative submission
Q2: Coordinates with ERCC on compensation sustainability; submitted with budget.
Q3 · Jan–Mar
Annual Board Self-Assessment – administer and report results
Receive GPRC self-assessment report; approve improvement priorities
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year assessment allows improvements before FY close.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Board & Committee Self-Assessment – administer and report
Report self-assessment results and recommend improvement priorities to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-FY assessment allows improvements before year-end.
Governance Risk & Alignment Report
Report material governance risks and recommended actions to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year report; includes statutory and regulatory monitoring.
RIO Compensation Policy – annual review and recommendation
Recommend compensation policy updates to SIB; confirm market competitiveness
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Informs Q4 ICP recommendation and budget planning.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Q4 · Apr–Jun
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – annual
Approve annual performance evaluation of the Executive Director
MUST be approved by June 30 (end of Q4). ERCC leads formal evaluation.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Approve Executive Director compensation for coming year
By June 30 (end of Q4); effective July 1 new fiscal year.
Incentive Compensation Plan – annual review and approval
Approve annual incentive compensation plan and ICM for all covered staff
Approved Q4 (Apr-Jun) to take effect July 1. ICM verified by independent consultant.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based internal audit work plan for the fiscal year
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Plan approved before fiscal year start (July 1); ARCC approves.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Benchmark Review – recommend to SIB
Recommend annual benchmarks to SIB for approval
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Consultant verifies; SIB approves; effective July 1.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based audit work plan and use of any third-party support
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1 start of new FY. Only item ARCC explicitly approves.
External Audit – scope and approach review
Review external auditor's proposed scope; coordinate with internal audit
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Scope agreed before June 30 FY end for timely audit commencement.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and recommend
Recommend annual calendar of Board and Committee decisions to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Prepared for SIB approval at Q1 organizational meeting.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Recommend ED performance goals to SIB for approval before fiscal year start
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Goals set before July 1 so they govern the entire new FY.
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – formal annual review
Recommend approval of formal ED evaluation to SIB (by June 30)
MUST be completed Q4 by June 30 (GPS p. 52). CLO/third party leads.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Recommend ED compensation to SIB for approval (by June 30)
Q4: Based on evaluation; new compensation effective July 1.
Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) – annual review and recommendation
Recommend annual ICP, ICM, and maximum incentive levels to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): SIB approves before July 1; ICM verified by independent consultant.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Recommend updated cost allocation methodology across 29 client funds to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1; effective for new FY.
Q1 · Jul–Sep
Election of Board Officers (Chair, Vice Chair)
Elect Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year
First meeting after July 1 each year (NDCC 21-10-04). Q1 = fiscal year opening.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and approve
Approve calendar of Board and Committee meetings and decision schedule
Set at annual organizational meeting (Q1, first meeting of new FY).
Conflict of Interest Determinations – annual review
Receive and act on annual COI disclosures; approve any determinations
Annual affirmation from all trustees and staff at FY opening (Q1).
Investment Policy Statement – approval of annual benchmarks
Approve annual benchmark recommendations from IC and independent consultant
Q1: New FY benchmarks in effect July 1; IC recommends, consultant verifies.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Approve ED performance goals for the upcoming fiscal year
Q1: Goals set at start of new FY (July 1) to guide year-long evaluation.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Approve cost allocation methodology across all 29 client funds
Q1: New FY cost allocations effective July 1; BFC recommends.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Approve updated enterprise risk management (ERM) framework
Q1: Framework refreshed at FY start; ARCC recommends to Board.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Performance & Evaluation Measures – annual review
Confirm or adjust evaluation methodologies and performance attribution
Q1: Confirmed at start of new FY.
Underperformance Thresholds & Watch Lists – annual reset
Approve updated thresholds; confirm or update manager watch list
Q1: Reset at FY open; triggers escalation to SIB when breached.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Recommend updated ERM framework to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; includes risk appetite and escalation protocols.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures – review annual affirmations
Review trustee and staff COI affirmations; report compliance status to SIB
Q1: Annual affirmation at FY opening; concurrent with Board COI review.
Policy Review Schedule – update and maintain
Confirm policy review schedule and assign ownership for upcoming reviews
Q1: Set at FY opening; rolling 3-year review plan.
Committee Charters – triennial review
Recommend updated Committee Charters to SIB
Q1: Review during summer/fall; SIB acts Q2.
Delegation of Authority – triennial review
Recommend updated Delegation of Authority to SIB
Q1: Reviewed with charters; SIB approves Q2.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Financial Policies Review – budget principles, reserves
Recommend updated Board-level financial policies to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; GPS p. 55.
Q2 · Oct–Dec
Delegation of Authority – full triennial review
Approve Delegation of Authority to Executive Director and Committees
Q2 (Oct-Dec): GPRC completes summer review; Board acts in fall.
Delegation of Authority Matrix – full triennial review
Approve updated Delegation of Authority Matrix
Reviewed jointly with Delegation of Authority; Q2.
Committee Charters – triennial review and update
Approve revised Committee Charters (all 5 committees)
GPRC leads summer review; Board approves Q2 (Oct-Dec).
Policy Review Schedule – approve triennial review plan
Approve 3-year rolling policy review schedule
Set with charter and delegation reviews each triennial cycle.
Internal Audit Findings – annual summary
Receive and act on material audit findings; approve corrective action plans
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Year-end audit concludes summer; results presented fall.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive annual compliance certification from management
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
Financial Statements – annual review and release approval
Approve release of annual financial statements to SIB and public
Q2: Audit of prior FY (ended June 30) typically complete by Oct-Dec.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Long-Term Funding Status – actuarial update (TFFR, PERS)
Receive funded status report; identify implications for asset allocation
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Actuarial valuations as of June 30 typically complete by fall.
Stress Testing & Scenario Framework – annual update
Approve stress test scenarios for the coming year
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Based on updated economic outlook after FY close.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Internal Audit Findings – annual report
Receive annual audit results; escalate significant findings to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Audit of FY ended June 30 typically complete by fall.
Director of Audit Annual Attestation – independence affirmation
Receive written attestation from the Director of Audit that no undue influence has been exerted
Q2: Concurrent with annual audit findings report; GPS p. 46.
Financial Statements – pre-release review with auditors
Receive financial statements; confirm accuracy and approve release
Q2 (Oct-Dec): FY-end audit complete; ARCC reviews before public release.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive management certification; report status to SIB
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
ARCC Annual Written Report to SIB
Approve and submit annual ARCC report describing responsibilities and activities
Q2: Describes prior FY activities; GPS p. 42.
Governance Policy Review Cycle – confirm cadence
Confirm review cadence remains appropriate; recommend changes if warranted
Q2: Annual review does not imply annual revision; GPS p. 49.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – annual review and payouts
Recommend LTIP structure and authorize prior-year payouts to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): 3-year rolling performance periods; payout after FY close.
Policy Adherence Summary & Surveys – annual report
Present survey results and policy adherence summary to SIB and TFFR Board
Q2: CLO/third party prepares; covers SIB client and RIO team surveys after FY close.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Multi-Year Financial Outlook – forward implications review
Present 3-year financial projections to SIB; identify funding risks
Q2 (Oct-Dec): After FY close; forward view covering staffing, technology, vendors.
Q3 · Jan–Mar
Executive Succession Plan – triennial review
Approve updated succession framework for ED, CIO, and CFO
Q3: Allows time to integrate with annual comp/evaluation cycle in Q4.
Annual Board Self-Assessment – administer and report results
Receive GPRC self-assessment report; approve improvement priorities
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year assessment allows improvements before FY close.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Board & Committee Self-Assessment – administer and report
Report self-assessment results and recommend improvement priorities to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-FY assessment allows improvements before year-end.
Governance Risk & Alignment Report
Report material governance risks and recommended actions to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year report; includes statutory and regulatory monitoring.
RIO Compensation Policy – annual review and recommendation
Recommend compensation policy updates to SIB; confirm market competitiveness
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Informs Q4 ICP recommendation and budget planning.
Executive Succession Plan – triennial review
Recommend updated succession framework for ED, CIO, CFO to SIB
Q3: Allows integration with Q4 compensation and goals cycle.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Q4 · Apr–Jun
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – annual
Approve annual performance evaluation of the Executive Director
MUST be approved by June 30 (end of Q4). ERCC leads formal evaluation.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Approve Executive Director compensation for coming year
By June 30 (end of Q4); effective July 1 new fiscal year.
Incentive Compensation Plan – annual review and approval
Approve annual incentive compensation plan and ICM for all covered staff
Approved Q4 (Apr-Jun) to take effect July 1. ICM verified by independent consultant.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based internal audit work plan for the fiscal year
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Plan approved before fiscal year start (July 1); ARCC approves.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Benchmark Review – recommend to SIB
Recommend annual benchmarks to SIB for approval
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Consultant verifies; SIB approves; effective July 1.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based audit work plan and use of any third-party support
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1 start of new FY. Only item ARCC explicitly approves.
External Audit – scope and approach review
Review external auditor's proposed scope; coordinate with internal audit
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Scope agreed before June 30 FY end for timely audit commencement.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and recommend
Recommend annual calendar of Board and Committee decisions to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Prepared for SIB approval at Q1 organizational meeting.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Recommend ED performance goals to SIB for approval before fiscal year start
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Goals set before July 1 so they govern the entire new FY.
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – formal annual review
Recommend approval of formal ED evaluation to SIB (by June 30)
MUST be completed Q4 by June 30 (GPS p. 52). CLO/third party leads.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Recommend ED compensation to SIB for approval (by June 30)
Q4: Based on evaluation; new compensation effective July 1.
Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) – annual review and recommendation
Recommend annual ICP, ICM, and maximum incentive levels to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): SIB approves before July 1; ICM verified by independent consultant.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Recommend updated cost allocation methodology across 29 client funds to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1; effective for new FY.
Q1 · Jul–Sep
Election of Board Officers (Chair, Vice Chair)
Elect Chair and Vice Chair for the coming year
First meeting after July 1 each year (NDCC 21-10-04). Q1 = fiscal year opening.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and approve
Approve calendar of Board and Committee meetings and decision schedule
Set at annual organizational meeting (Q1, first meeting of new FY).
Conflict of Interest Determinations – annual review
Receive and act on annual COI disclosures; approve any determinations
Annual affirmation from all trustees and staff at FY opening (Q1).
Election of Officers Process – 5-year formal reaffirmation
Reaffirm officer election process and succession protocol
5-year structural review; at FY opening.
Investment Policy Statement – approval of annual benchmarks
Approve annual benchmark recommendations from IC and independent consultant
Q1: New FY benchmarks in effect July 1; IC recommends, consultant verifies.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Approve ED performance goals for the upcoming fiscal year
Q1: Goals set at start of new FY (July 1) to guide year-long evaluation.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Approve cost allocation methodology across all 29 client funds
Q1: New FY cost allocations effective July 1; BFC recommends.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Approve updated enterprise risk management (ERM) framework
Q1: Framework refreshed at FY start; ARCC recommends to Board.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Performance & Evaluation Measures – annual review
Confirm or adjust evaluation methodologies and performance attribution
Q1: Confirmed at start of new FY.
Underperformance Thresholds & Watch Lists – annual reset
Approve updated thresholds; confirm or update manager watch list
Q1: Reset at FY open; triggers escalation to SIB when breached.
Investment Beliefs – full review and reaffirmation
Recommend affirmed or revised Investment Beliefs to SIB
Q1 of 5-year cycle; foundational; SIB approves Q2.
Liquidity Framework – 5-year review
Recommend updated liquidity framework and minimum liquidity requirements
Q1 of Y2 in cycle; covers all client funds' differing liquidity profiles.
Rebalancing Policy – 5-year review
Recommend updated rebalancing policy and trigger thresholds
Q1: Effective with new FY; corridor bands and frequency.
Use of Leverage / Derivatives / Alternatives – policy review
Recommend updated policy on use of leverage, derivatives, and alternatives
IC recommends; SIB approves.
Manager Hiring and Termination Criteria – 5-year review
Recommend updated manager evaluation criteria and termination thresholds
Q1: Covers both internal and external managers.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Risk Management Framework – annual review
Recommend updated ERM framework to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; includes risk appetite and escalation protocols.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures – review annual affirmations
Review trustee and staff COI affirmations; report compliance status to SIB
Q1: Annual affirmation at FY opening; concurrent with Board COI review.
Policy Review Schedule – update and maintain
Confirm policy review schedule and assign ownership for upcoming reviews
Q1: Set at FY opening; rolling 3-year review plan.
Governance Policies & Code of Conduct – triennial review
Recommend updated GPS manual and Code of Conduct to SIB
Q1 of Y2/Y5 (staggered from charter review); SIB approves Q2.
Hiring / Termination of Fiduciary Advisors
Recommend engagement or termination of governance/legal advisors to SIB
Q1: 5-year RFP cycle; event-driven otherwise.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Financial Policies Review – budget principles, reserves
Recommend updated Board-level financial policies to SIB
Q1: Refreshed at FY start; GPS p. 55.
Q2 · Oct–Dec
Governance Policies & Code of Conduct – triennial review
Approve updated Governance Policy System manual and Code of Conduct
Staggered from charter review by one cycle; Q2 of Y2/Y5.
Hiring / Termination of Governance and Fiduciary Advisors
Approve engagement or termination of governance and fiduciary advisors
5-year RFP review; Q2 to allow summer evaluation period.
Investment Beliefs – 5-year reaffirmation
Affirm or revise Board's investment beliefs statement
Q2: Foundational review early in 5-year cycle; IC recommends.
Use of Leverage / Derivatives / Alternatives – policy review
Approve or reaffirm policy on leverage, derivatives, and alternative investments
5-year fundamental risk policy item.
Annual Operating Budget – biennial approval for Legislature
Approve biennial operating budget for submission to ND Legislature
Q2 (Oct-Dec): ND Legislature convenes odd-year Jan sessions; budget submitted fall.
Staffing Levels & Key Positions – biennial approval
Approve staffing plan and key positions for legislative submission
Submitted with biennial budget request Q2; aligned with legislative calendar.
Internal Audit Findings – annual summary
Receive and act on material audit findings; approve corrective action plans
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Year-end audit concludes summer; results presented fall.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive annual compliance certification from management
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
Financial Statements – annual review and release approval
Approve release of annual financial statements to SIB and public
Q2: Audit of prior FY (ended June 30) typically complete by Oct-Dec.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Long-Term Funding Status – actuarial update (TFFR, PERS)
Receive funded status report; identify implications for asset allocation
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Actuarial valuations as of June 30 typically complete by fall.
Stress Testing & Scenario Framework – annual update
Approve stress test scenarios for the coming year
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Based on updated economic outlook after FY close.
Asset Allocation Policy – full review
Recommend updated Asset Allocation Policy to SIB for approval
Q2: Deep liability and peer review in fall; SIB acts Q3.
Long-term Objectives & Risk Appetite – 5-year review
Recommend updated long-term objectives and risk appetite to SIB
Q2: Follows investment beliefs; drives SAA and active risk for cycle.
Concentration Limits – 5-year review
Recommend updated concentration limits by asset class and manager
Q2: Single-manager and single-security limits.
Performance & Evaluation Framework – 5-year comprehensive review
Recommend updated performance evaluation framework to SIB
Q2: Attribution, peer comparison, and reporting standards.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Internal Audit Findings – annual report
Receive annual audit results; escalate significant findings to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): Audit of FY ended June 30 typically complete by fall.
Director of Audit Annual Attestation – independence affirmation
Receive written attestation from the Director of Audit that no undue influence has been exerted
Q2: Concurrent with annual audit findings report; GPS p. 46.
Financial Statements – pre-release review with auditors
Receive financial statements; confirm accuracy and approve release
Q2 (Oct-Dec): FY-end audit complete; ARCC reviews before public release.
Certification of Compliance with Statutory Duties
Receive management certification; report status to SIB
Q2: ED certifies compliance for prior FY (ended June 30); ARCC verifies.
ARCC Annual Written Report to SIB
Approve and submit annual ARCC report describing responsibilities and activities
Q2: Describes prior FY activities; GPS p. 42.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – annual review and payouts
Recommend LTIP structure and authorize prior-year payouts to SIB
Q2 (Oct-Dec): 3-year rolling performance periods; payout after FY close.
Policy Adherence Summary & Surveys – annual report
Present survey results and policy adherence summary to SIB and TFFR Board
Q2: CLO/third party prepares; covers SIB client and RIO team surveys after FY close.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Multi-Year Financial Outlook – forward implications review
Present 3-year financial projections to SIB; identify funding risks
Q2 (Oct-Dec): After FY close; forward view covering staffing, technology, vendors.
Annual Operating Budget – biennial preparation for Legislature
Recommend biennial operating budget to SIB for legislative submission
Q2 (Oct-Dec): ND Legislature convenes odd-year Jan; budget submitted fall preceding session.
Staffing Levels & Key Positions – biennial recommendation
Recommend staffing plan to SIB for legislative submission
Q2: Coordinates with ERCC on compensation sustainability; submitted with budget.
Q3 · Jan–Mar
Asset Allocation Policy – 4-year formal review
Approve updated Asset Allocation Policy for all client funds
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Deep review during legislative session off-season; IC recommends.
Long-term Objectives & Risk Appetite – 5-year review
Approve long-term return objectives and total fund risk appetite
Q3: Follows investment beliefs; drives SAA and active risk for cycle.
Annual Board Self-Assessment – administer and report results
Receive GPRC self-assessment report; approve improvement priorities
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year assessment allows improvements before FY close.
Governance Effectiveness Review – external peer review
Commission and receive results of independent governance review
Every 5 years; Q3 allows board to act on findings before cycle renewal.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Strategic Asset Allocation Targets – full review
Recommend updated SAA targets for each client fund to SIB
Q3: Follows Asset Allocation Policy; SIB approves Q4 for July 1 effect.
Active Risk / Tracking Error Limits – 5-year review
Recommend updated active risk limits to SIB
Q3: Follows risk appetite decision.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Board & Committee Self-Assessment – administer and report
Report self-assessment results and recommend improvement priorities to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-FY assessment allows improvements before year-end.
Governance Risk & Alignment Report
Report material governance risks and recommended actions to SIB
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Mid-year report; includes statutory and regulatory monitoring.
External Governance Effectiveness Review – commission
Recommend engagement of independent governance reviewer; present results to SIB
Q3: Commissioned mid-year; results allow Board to act before cycle renewal.
RIO Compensation Policy – annual review and recommendation
Recommend compensation policy updates to SIB; confirm market competitiveness
Q3 (Jan-Mar): Informs Q4 ICP recommendation and budget planning.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Q4 · Apr–Jun
Strategic Asset Allocation Targets – 4-year review
Approve SAA targets for Legacy Fund, PERS, TFFR, and WSI
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Follows asset allocation policy; effective July 1 new FY.
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – annual
Approve annual performance evaluation of the Executive Director
MUST be approved by June 30 (end of Q4). ERCC leads formal evaluation.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Approve Executive Director compensation for coming year
By June 30 (end of Q4); effective July 1 new fiscal year.
Incentive Compensation Plan – annual review and approval
Approve annual incentive compensation plan and ICM for all covered staff
Approved Q4 (Apr-Jun) to take effect July 1. ICM verified by independent consultant.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based internal audit work plan for the fiscal year
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Plan approved before fiscal year start (July 1); ARCC approves.
Investment Performance Dashboard – total fund, asset class, client fund
Receive and review; escalate exceptions to SIB if thresholds breached
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting for Legacy, PERS, TFFR, WSI.
Active Risk vs. Benchmark – tracking error review
Receive report; initiate corrective action if active risk exceeds approved limits
All 4 FY quarters; compared to IC-approved active risk budget.
Capital Development Pacing – private markets deployment
Receive pacing report; confirm deployment is on plan
All 4 FY quarters; annual commitment pacing tracked quarterly.
Market Stress & Liquidity Event Response – monitoring
Receive liquidity status; authorize response actions if stress event occurs
All 4 FY quarters; ongoing monitoring.
Benchmark Review – recommend to SIB
Recommend annual benchmarks to SIB for approval
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Consultant verifies; SIB approves; effective July 1.
Corrective Action Plans – status update on all open audit findings
Receive progress report; escalate overdue items to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; 30-day corrective action requirement.
Enterprise Risk Report – KPRIs, material risks, emerging issues
Receive risk dashboard; escalate material exposures to Board
All 4 FY quarters; financial, operational, compliance, technology, reputational risks.
Investment & Risk Dashboards – operational risk lens
Receive operational risk indicators; note exceptions
All 4 FY quarters; distinct from IC investment risk monitoring.
Compliance Report – legal, regulatory, and ethics updates
Receive compliance status; action any compliance failures
All 4 FY quarters; Open Meetings, ethics filings, staff adherence.
Annual Internal Audit Plan – approval
Approve risk-based audit work plan and use of any third-party support
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1 start of new FY. Only item ARCC explicitly approves.
External Audit – scope and approach review
Review external auditor's proposed scope; coordinate with internal audit
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Scope agreed before June 30 FY end for timely audit commencement.
Annual Governance Calendar – review and recommend
Recommend annual calendar of Board and Committee decisions to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Prepared for SIB approval at Q1 organizational meeting.
Election of Officers Process – 5-year reaffirmation
Recommend reaffirmation or revision of officer election process to SIB
Q4: Recommended in spring; SIB acts at Q1 organizational meeting.
Executive Director Performance Goals – set for coming FY
Recommend ED performance goals to SIB for approval before fiscal year start
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Goals set before July 1 so they govern the entire new FY.
Executive Director Performance Evaluation – formal annual review
Recommend approval of formal ED evaluation to SIB (by June 30)
MUST be completed Q4 by June 30 (GPS p. 52). CLO/third party leads.
Executive Director Compensation Recommendation
Recommend ED compensation to SIB for approval (by June 30)
Q4: Based on evaluation; new compensation effective July 1.
Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) – annual review and recommendation
Recommend annual ICP, ICM, and maximum incentive levels to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): SIB approves before July 1; ICM verified by independent consultant.
Financial Performance Report – actual vs. budget variances
Receive exception-based report; escalate material variances to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; exception-based reporting.
Resource Adequacy Monitoring – staffing, technology, vendor costs
Receive sustainability indicators; flag resource constraints to SIB
All 4 FY quarters; AUM-per-FTE benchmarking context.
Statutory & Appropriation Alignment – compliance monitoring
Confirm operations remain within legislative appropriation limits
All 4 FY quarters; line-item appropriation compliance.
Cost Allocation Methodology – annual review
Recommend updated cost allocation methodology across 29 client funds to SIB
Q4 (Apr-Jun): Approved before July 1; effective for new FY.
Response to Governance Failure or Breach
Take corrective action; authorize investigation or remediation
Event-driven; GPRC refers to Board.
Declaration of Emergency Authority
Authorize emergency governance powers or actions
Event-driven; requires Board quorum.
Litigation Strategy & Settlement Authorization
Authorize litigation strategy or settlement
Event-driven; ED notifies Board promptly.
Escalation of Issue to Legislature
Authorize formal communication to Legislature on material matter
Event-driven; requires Chair and ED coordination.
Manager Guideline Waiver Requests
Approve or deny waivers to investment guidelines
Emergency: IC Chair + Vice Chair + CIO/ED; ratified at next meeting.
New Investment Strategies / Instruments
Recommend new strategies, portfolios, or instruments to SIB
Presented to IC before implementation.
Special Investigations – authorize and oversee
Authorize special investigation; oversee conduct and report findings
Event-driven; ARCC may initiate independently.
External Auditor Appointment / Termination
Recommend appointment or termination of independent external auditors to SIB
Event-driven; periodic RFP or performance-based.
Significant Compliance / Ethics / Fraud Matter
Escalate material matter to SIB; authorize corrective action
Promptly escalated to ARCC Chair then full Board.
Director of Audit Hiring / Termination
Participate with ED in appointment or change of the Director of Audit
ARCC co-participates with ED; GPS p. 44.
Exception Requests to Policy
Review policy exception requests; recommend action to SIB
Event-driven; GPRC reviews and recommends.
Response to Governance Failure or Breach
Recommend corrective action and remediation plan to SIB
GPRC leads initial investigation; refers to full Board.
Legal Counsel – engagement and direction
Recommend engagement and scope of legal counsel to SIB
Event-driven; coordinates with ED and Chair.
Hiring / Termination of Chief Executive (Executive Director)
Recommend to SIB; manage search or separation process
Event-driven; ERCC leads with independent advisor.
Engagement of Independent Third-Party Advisor
Recommend engagement of compensation/evaluation advisor to SIB
Required before formally engaging third party for annual ED review.
Capital Expenditures – continuing authority review
Recommend capital expenditure under continuing authority to SIB
Event-driven; IT systems, facility, or major contract.
Fee & Expense Policy – if off-books authority granted
Recommend fee and expense policy to SIB
Applicable only if SIB obtains off-books appropriation authority.
No scheduled items match these filters. Try clearing a filter or your search.